And how does JB explain the $200,000 price tag for the pictures of a missing child belonging to his innocent client. If his client was innocent as he believed at the time why would the media pay $200,000 for Caylee's pictures, plus JB said there was talk from ABC about a possible $700,000 for KC's story after the trial. Just for a missing child.
If JB had not gone on TV and encouraged the A's to do so as well this would not have the coverage it has now. If KC was innocent, as JB claims, where is the evidence to prove her innocence. It should have been released a long time ago through discovery. Innocent people never lose track of their children JB. Never. And news flash here JB. Just because SA has mountains of evidence does not mean they are being unfair to KC. I believe JA has spoken up many times in court to correct mistakes by the defense that would have hurt JB's client. jmo