Shutterfly
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2008
- Messages
- 2,100
- Reaction score
- 26
Okay, see if I've got this right... I looked over it last night, thought about it, and I'm flying by the seat of my pants. I'll go back and check it for inaccuracies in my three brain cells afterward...
No one knew for certain that Rachel was supposed to go to Moscow Friday.
The Yukon she was driving was apparently gone for days and that didn't seem to raise the alarm and summon the troops to find her.
Her car had been literally beaten to death by some, as of yet unnamed *ahem* person.
Rachel's ex admits to "stalking" her but not systematically beating the stuffing out of her car.
She had no money to fix said car anymore because of the damage that had been done to it.
Her ex 'volunteered' to fix her car for her.
Her car was at ex's shop and she was driving some other person's Yukon.
Well, she made mention that she knew who was beating up her car, Thusday I think it was?
If she was expecting her car to be ready Friday, it would make sense she would tell people during regular conversation that she was supposed to pick it up. Likely she might tell the owner of the Yukon "btw, if I'm lucky, I'll be able to give you your truck back Friday when I go get my car" or perhaps she'd tell her children "I'm so glad I'm getting MY car back Friday. She said nothing to anyone.
Imagine.....you've given your car to this guy to fix it for you, thinking he's being a decent human being in spite of the sordid history between you. You find out after he has the car that he's "the one' beating up your car and/or texting and stalking you. Wow, now wtf do you do? What have the police done? Nothing. You 'know it' but maybe you still can't prove it. Sometimes a a strong woman will throw caution out the window and move in the direction of confrontation. Or maybe she popped up at the shop thinking he wasn't there, and was snooping around for proof? She would tell no one where she was going if she was searching for proof because at that point she probably wouldn't know who to trust anymore.
If no one knew where she was, then either he followed her to the shop or she must have gone there unannounced and he was there or showed up there....I would think.
All the locations are 'bunched" together except the Moscow shop location. It looks to me like he was trying to bring the evidence (ie Yukon) back down to the area where she lived to make it look more like a random act or as if she just left. The Yukon was found near the bus station as I recall.
It's my opinion that, God forbid, Rachel is found and has been harmed....that she won't be near her home or these other locations. She'll be near the shop in Moscow. But it'll be somewhere that stalker of hers is very familiar with.
And naturally.....I'm just guessing and that's JMO. Oh, and the person who did this doesn't seem terribly bright to me....I predict an arrest pretty soon unless they find a smiling, happy, nicely tanned Rachel who says she just needed a break and did in fact get on a bus and disappear for a few days.
The statistics for women being the victims of domestic homicide in this country are staggering. It's like this exclusive club, almost like gang affiliation as sick and morbid as that sounds. Everyone around them can usually see it. You're beat down, sometimes just with words, lulled into a false sense of security, you learn to blame yourself for the abuse, and many of them 'blood out' in the end, just as in a gang. If Rachel has been harmed by this man after all of the reports of stalking, etc, it will serve as an ugly reminder why many women don't abandon their abuser. The fear is real.
Been there, done that.
No one knew for certain that Rachel was supposed to go to Moscow Friday.
The Yukon she was driving was apparently gone for days and that didn't seem to raise the alarm and summon the troops to find her.
Her car had been literally beaten to death by some, as of yet unnamed *ahem* person.
Rachel's ex admits to "stalking" her but not systematically beating the stuffing out of her car.
She had no money to fix said car anymore because of the damage that had been done to it.
Her ex 'volunteered' to fix her car for her.
Her car was at ex's shop and she was driving some other person's Yukon.
Well, she made mention that she knew who was beating up her car, Thusday I think it was?
If she was expecting her car to be ready Friday, it would make sense she would tell people during regular conversation that she was supposed to pick it up. Likely she might tell the owner of the Yukon "btw, if I'm lucky, I'll be able to give you your truck back Friday when I go get my car" or perhaps she'd tell her children "I'm so glad I'm getting MY car back Friday. She said nothing to anyone.
Imagine.....you've given your car to this guy to fix it for you, thinking he's being a decent human being in spite of the sordid history between you. You find out after he has the car that he's "the one' beating up your car and/or texting and stalking you. Wow, now wtf do you do? What have the police done? Nothing. You 'know it' but maybe you still can't prove it. Sometimes a a strong woman will throw caution out the window and move in the direction of confrontation. Or maybe she popped up at the shop thinking he wasn't there, and was snooping around for proof? She would tell no one where she was going if she was searching for proof because at that point she probably wouldn't know who to trust anymore.
If no one knew where she was, then either he followed her to the shop or she must have gone there unannounced and he was there or showed up there....I would think.
All the locations are 'bunched" together except the Moscow shop location. It looks to me like he was trying to bring the evidence (ie Yukon) back down to the area where she lived to make it look more like a random act or as if she just left. The Yukon was found near the bus station as I recall.
It's my opinion that, God forbid, Rachel is found and has been harmed....that she won't be near her home or these other locations. She'll be near the shop in Moscow. But it'll be somewhere that stalker of hers is very familiar with.
And naturally.....I'm just guessing and that's JMO. Oh, and the person who did this doesn't seem terribly bright to me....I predict an arrest pretty soon unless they find a smiling, happy, nicely tanned Rachel who says she just needed a break and did in fact get on a bus and disappear for a few days.
The statistics for women being the victims of domestic homicide in this country are staggering. It's like this exclusive club, almost like gang affiliation as sick and morbid as that sounds. Everyone around them can usually see it. You're beat down, sometimes just with words, lulled into a false sense of security, you learn to blame yourself for the abuse, and many of them 'blood out' in the end, just as in a gang. If Rachel has been harmed by this man after all of the reports of stalking, etc, it will serve as an ugly reminder why many women don't abandon their abuser. The fear is real.
Been there, done that.
