But you seemed to imply that Sleuthy was distancing herself from Waterbury's remarks because Waterbury was on the "bandwagon". As Sleuthy herself points out, she was merely following proper citation rules.
I realize AK's family has been very active in rounding up support for her and perhaps there are internet posters who are so emotionally involved with AK personally that it influences their views of the evidence.
But I've seen none of that sort of "virtual" attachment here. I'll say it again: I don't know Amanda Knox (or even much about her outside the details that seem relevant to this case) and I have no emotional investment in her guilt or evidence.
I will admit, however, that I am strongly opposed to convicting anyone for any crime without strong corroborating evidence
*No, I realized that SG was posting it to back her views. I just pointed out what IMO was wrong about his 'testing/views'.
*For sure.
*At no time have I noticed anyone accusing you of having any 'attachment'.
*IMO, and as I'm sure is quite redundant- there is plenty of 'corroborating' evidence. In fact that can be turned around: Is there ANY corroborating evidence (or any at all) that they were NOT involved in the murder of Meredith?
Here's a few corroborators:
-No alibi for AK or RS. (Computer does NOT show human activity)
-Luminal BARE footprints in hallway attributed to AK and RS.
-A BARE footprint on the bathroom mat attributed to RS.
-AK's dna mixed with Meredith's blood in at least 5 places. Several are AK's blood mixed in the bathroom.
-AK's dna and Meredith's on the knife. If the test is verified it will be a 'death blow' to her defense. If not, she still will have little chance at appeal IMO.
-RS's dna on the bra clasp. If verified... see above.
-An obvious staging of a break-in.
-Evidence of a clean-up.
-An admittance by AK of being at the crime scene at least twice.
-Both admitting being under the influence to such an extent that they 'lost' some of their memory.
-Repeated 'rubbish' told by both accused on what actually happened that night and the early morning.
-Another person convicted and all appeals failed. Found CONTRIBUTING and CO-RESPONSIBLE for Meredith's death.
These are facts IMO, no excuses or counterarguments are necessary. No mentions of weird or exotic behavior, no 'media' spins, no accusation, no added rumors, no added stories, no added anything. I could but it would go for pages and pages.
***What corroborating 'things' on the innocent side? :waitasec:
)
