Floh said:It's the look on her face; the way her shorts are falling off her (non-existent at her age) hips; the (fake, i hope) tattoo.
i don't like the string bikini (don't care if it is an advertising campaign) and i especially don't like how the photo of the girls' hugging would be what a paedophile would think of as an invitation to party with the pair of them.
for a family album, a different perspective. out there in public? a big fat NO! :banghead:
my cousin put his young (7) daughter's pictures up on the internet (such a pretty, pretty girl, we, as a family are so proud of her, but we (the family) kicked his head in for making access for just anyone to see! we still talk about it! even my 74 year old cousin talks about it cos she's not an idiot!
he, on the other hand, although deservedly proud of his daughter, is sooo naive.
Edited to add: I hope Cindy Crawford and her husband are castigated in the press for doing this to beat some sense into them! :banghead:
I agree. I mean dont these people know how many pervs there are in the world today, or are they so into their own world they dont see it. It is not right to have your daughter pose like that for the whole world too see.shopper said:It's the "topless" one (ewww I hate saying that in context to a child) that I'm referring to, the rest IMO are fine as it's for children's swimwear. The seductive pose without a top is just wrong and I don't care for the tatoo on a five year old, fake or not.
I would have thought Cindy would have better sense than that.
lizzybeth said:I'm sorry I feel this way because a picture of child whether topless or whatever should be viewed as innocent. My first thought when I saw the top pic was that it was a pedophile's dream. Then I got down to the bottom pics and the one of her and the other little girl hugging each other bothered me too. No way would I have pictures like that on the internet of my daughter.
Have I just become too cynical from reading about all the abuse done to our children today?
shopper said:I have friends who have family websites, with their pictures posted and little updates on whats going on. Completely innocent and IMO it's an easy way to share what's going on in your life with family members or friends who live far away. But sometimes I just get the creeps thinking about what perverts may be looking at the kids pictures. I guess you have to decide if it's worth it. I thought about having one when I have my baby, but I think that I may just email any pictures to people I trust instead of a website, for anyone to stumble onto.
Sorry to get o/t.
2luvmy said:Shopper, I use shutterfly to share photos with my family and friends. When you sign up, they give you your own web address where you can upload pictures into albums and then send the link to family and friends and it can only be accesses with a password given by you. Then family and friends can view the pictures and order. You can even add captions to the photos and an introduction to the album.