Who told P.I. not to call 911 if body found?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Logic dictates it had to be someone for whom he was WORKING. Sure, he can get a TIP from anyone BUT for someone to tell him NOT to call 911 (and for him to "listen" to it) it had to have been someone for which he was working and took direction. Who could that be?

He said he was working for:

1. Baez
2. Casey
3. Cindy and George.

He ruled out Cindy and George, right? That leaves #1 or #2 (IF YOU BELIEVE HIM...).

Working for C & G and therefore Lee, who didn't live in the home during the time this took place?
 
I wonder if it in fact was KC who told DC not to call 911, reason is in the daily updates it says he had a seperate contract with KC herself?? Hm??
 
I agree with the idea that the person who sent DC to "walk" or search the area and the person who gave him instructions not to call LE if he found Caylee's remains don't necessarily have to be the same person. Could be, but doesn't absolutely have to be.

I see Casey as the possible source for the information leading to searching there, but I don't have any certainty as to the route the information might have taken. If she thought she'd found someone she could manipulate to help her evade responsibility, that's who she'd tell. There's a list of candidates.

On the A/C privilege issue: as much as people hate the idea, I don't think JB was under an ethical obligation, if, hypothetically speaking, his client admitted the crime and the location of the body, to reveal that to LE. I think privilege would prevent that (assuming the communication of the info from the client was made under the right conditions, not waived by the presence of any extraneous 3rd parties, etc.). Beyond that, it gets a lot murkier. I can imagine a defense attorney maybe wishing to confirm his client's story by taking a look, or checking out how likely it might be that the body will be discovered. Could he send an investigator to MERELY look and report back? Could that ever reliably be done without interfering with the crime scene or taking a chance that evidence might be altered or destroyed or contaminated? This is why people connected to the case and who can do so should give their information to LE and let them handle it.
 
Working for C & G and therefore Lee, who didn't live in the home during the time this took place?

George and Cindy and DC share the same lawyer. There is no conflict of interest between these 3 legally.

Lee has a separate lawyer.
 
Family WOULD want the body found.

A defense lawyer can't betray "privileged" information. Nor do they run around looking for bodies. That is somebody else's job.

IMO

Precisely, that's why JB wasn't out in the woods knee deep in undergrowth probing the ground with a specialist tool for locating buried bodies - DC was!

Has anybody thought that maybe this was the very reason DC was no longer contracted to JB?
 
I agree with the idea that the person who sent DC to "walk" or search the area and the person who gave him instructions not to call LE if he found Caylee's remains don't necessarily have to be the same person. Could be, but doesn't absolutely have to be.

I see Casey as the possible source for the information leading to searching there, but I don't have any certainty as to the route the information might have taken. If she thought she'd found someone she could manipulate to help her evade responsibility, that's who she'd tell. There's a list of candidates.

On the A/C privilege issue: as much as people hate the idea, I don't think JB was under an ethical obligation, if, hypothetically speaking, his client admitted the crime and the location of the body, to reveal that to LE. I think privilege would prevent that (assuming the communication of the info from the client was made under the right conditions, not waived by the presence of any extraneous 3rd parties, etc.). Beyond that, it gets a lot murkier. I can imagine a defense attorney maybe wishing to confirm his client's story by taking a look, or checking out how likely it might be that the body will be discovered. Could he send an investigator to MERELY look and report back? Could that ever reliably be done without interfering with the crime scene or taking a chance that evidence might be altered or destroyed or contaminated? This is why people connected to the case and who can do so should give their information to LE and let them handle it.

Baez is an officer of the court and the defendant's attorney.

He wouldn't tell LE where the body was OR go find the body.

His job is to defend Casey. If she confessed and said where the body was, I think ethically his obligation is to encourage Casey to 'fess up. But, he can't make her do it or go against her wishes.

IMO
 
When the DC video first came out, NG discussed obstruction on her show. I was surprised to learn that if a person finds a body it is not a crime not to report it. (anyone else remember this?) Tampering with evidence is a crime but if someone sees the body and does nothing, it is not obstruction. Maybe JB explained the law to DC during his employment and he interpreted that to mean, don't call 911.
 
Baez would not have sent DC out on "assignment" after accepting his "termination".

I was mainly addressing whether an attorney would have to tell LE if his client told him such information. Beyond that, I don't know either what JB did do or would have done, or even if we've heard reliable information about who was working for whom and when. CA seemed to state that she'd sent her people to the area where the body was later found, and I tend to think she meant it.
 
I am so glad you said that. That is what I see too when looking at those photos. Notice the bible placed next to Casey's bed. The montage of Caylee pics...overkill. IMO

I am so glad you said that. That was my thought as well.
 
Nobody answered my question. Do KFN work for the Anthonys?
I wouldn't say that they work FOR the Anthony's, they had a relationship with them and they worked together doing whatever they did, passing out bracelets, T-shirts (I mean selling, not passing out). I don't think the relationship would be classified as KF's working for the Anthony's, but others may feel differantly...is this a gray area ?
 
I agree with the idea that the person who sent DC to "walk" or search the area and the person who gave him instructions not to call LE if he found Caylee's remains don't necessarily have to be the same person. Could be, but doesn't absolutely have to be.

I see Casey as the possible source for the information leading to searching there, but I don't have any certainty as to the route the information might have taken. If she thought she'd found someone she could manipulate to help her evade responsibility, that's who she'd tell. There's a list of candidates.

Respectfully snipped

I agree with this scenario.

Someone has just started an interesting link:http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80103 I think this has some ramifications over here. If in fact, JB does have unlimited internet access, what would prevent Casey having the laptop in front of her, (picture JB sitting across the table from her unable to see the keyboard). What would prevent Casey from communicating directly with DC via something like Googlemail's chat facility?

This has only just occured to me, so haven't thought through it yet. Seems to me we need to find out just what kind of internet access JB has in his jail meetings with Casey. Does anyone know how we can do that?
 
Isn't KFN some sort of not-for-profit corporation that is supposed to lend aid to families of missing children? I don't think they have any legally recognized relationship with the A's just because of that. Their presence at otherwise privileged conversations would waive the privilege, for example.

In recent days, maybe GA has a position with KFN, but that's a different matter.
 
Not necessarily. Think about it. Who's always hovering in the background? And I don't mean LP.

My opinion only, my thoughts only, my ideas only.

Would DC listen to them? Would they have that kind of authority? I wouldn't put a single thing past those two, including 'faking' a case to solicit more fraudulent donations. I just question whether they would be in a position to issue such a directive without CA's full knowledge or obo CA.
 
I think it was the A's and I think if found they would have disposed of the body. CA figured no body, no crime.
 
Sorry took so long to answer. I fell asleep (again!) so it appears I'm here.........lol

I'm thinking of the lye, or something like that which they spread over the back yard. But, I may be confused here since I think it was used after the July holiday when probably Caylee was already down the street?

I thought it may have transferred onto the bags when she laied her down in the yard while using the shovel (ugh!) to dig a hole, then abandoned the idea because either the dogs were all over Caylee or it was just to much for Casey to dig deep enough?

Thanks. I vote KC is too lazy to dig a proper hole. Arrogant, lazy and stupid, imo. Which more than the other, though, varies from day to day. :)
 
Would DC listen to them? Would they have that kind of authority? I wouldn't put a single thing past those two, including 'faking' a case to solicit more fraudulent donations. I just question whether they would be in a position to issue such a directive without CA's full knowledge or obo CA.

"She said to tell you"????? I've used and heard that one myself. Maybe, I don't know, but possible in my very humble opinion. Guess it depends on WHO was paying him. Ya know, follow the money trail? WHO stands to benefit financially? In this case ANYTHING is possible. And, we ain't seen the end of the shock and awe yet.

Thirty-one days later a distraught-sounding voice tells of a missing granddaughter. "I've got to find her." "I've". [/B ] Me, myself, and I. The rest is history folks. 'Course all of it isn't written yet.

My opinion only, conjecture only, thoughts only, disgust the only true feeling.
I'm rambling, but it's all good - life is beautiful.
 
Nobody pays them to look for bodies.

Baez terminated his contract with DC on October 1 in WRITING.

IMO, that says it all.

whoosh.gif


Ok, sorry to be so dense. It's probably obvious to everyone else, but I've been gone for hour or two and have kind of lost the context.

Are you saying that JB terminated contract with instructions to wait a period of time so it wouldn't be connected back to JB? But now he wants to claim privilege because it's blowing up in his face a bit? Otherwise, the meaning went right by me.
 
Respectfully snipped

I agree with this scenario.

Someone has just started an interesting link:http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80103 I think this has some ramifications over here. If in fact, JB does have unlimited internet access, what would prevent Casey having the laptop in front of her, (picture JB sitting across the table from her unable to see the keyboard). What would prevent Casey from communicating directly with DC via something like Googlemail's chat facility?

This has only just occured to me, so haven't thought through it yet. Seems to me we need to find out just what kind of internet access JB has in his jail meetings with Casey. Does anyone know how we can do that?
I am interested in the answer to this question too. I have heard differant things, once I heard that internet access is not allowed in that part of the jail and then I have heard from others that it is possible. :confused:
 
I am interested in the answer to this question too. I have heard differant things, once I heard that internet access is not allowed in that part of the jail and then I have heard from others that it is possible. :confused:

I talk to my son via computer. No telephone necessary, probably no monitoring either - unless they catch the airwaves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
167
Guests online
3,729
Total visitors
3,896

Forum statistics

Threads
592,522
Messages
17,970,319
Members
228,793
Latest member
aztraea
Back
Top