Witness accounts

[AJ Noiter]

BBM

I don't see what that has to do with them changing their stories. No witness saw or heard GZ confront TM. No witness has a statement, whether initially or corrected that collaborates 'GZ tracked down and killed'. The one witness who saw two people running (which does not benefit GZ) backtracked on that. Are they changing their story because they really didn't see what they thought they saw or are they changing their story because they see how the case has exploded and what the public sentiment it?

If you are a witness, you report what you saw or heard. You then don't change your statement because you believe GZ tracked down and killed TM, despite the fact you never saw anything that preceded the confrontation.

Well, some did, but a witness with integrity doesn't

 

[zenreaper]

I think that theory is grabbing at straws when it was pretty clear what LE was saying. Dispatch had no idea what TM was doing or where he was or what was visible to GZ. He was not giving GZ permission to get out of his car and track TM down. He was asking GZ to keep them abreast if he saw TM doing something else. Not that he should follow. Plus GZ knew better and you should never assume when it involves the safety of others. jmo

Yes, dispatch DID know what TM was doing, as they were getting the blow by blow by GZ on the phone. And, FWIW, its tough to keep someone abreast of what another person is doing when that person runs out of your sight, unless you FOLLOW them.