I cannot read the SW affidavit and agree with everything stated. They are very much putting forth their theory dotted with a few inserts of factual information wordsmithed into a viable reason to get the SW. Not necessarily the way it actually took place, but it is their version of events. Like putting the words into SB's mouth that what EA did was a sexual overture which then made him angry. That may not have been exactly what happened, but since SB agreed to what he said...it then became a "fact". These "facts" are subject to change.
Do I have to believe everything LE puts out there? No. I don't. I have seen many LE departments make mistakes you could drive a truck through and end up having to backtrack on their assumptions.
If your quest is to attack LE's work, and assume they're stupid, count me out. Or rather, expect me to push back hard every time you do so. This is not about opinions that you're questioning - you're assuming that you can ascertain accurate time, and they can't. That's just wrong.
If you want to assert that they are screwing it up, and don't know how to investigate properly and are not to be trusted when they provide facts, the burden of proof is on you to demonstrate what they have done wrong. "I don't know what they might have done" is not the same thing.