Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 19 - Shortest Court Day, EVER

Status
Not open for further replies.
SCxTrOC.png

2/27/2015
slinkpod
2/28/2015
myvice
3/4/2015
Tsitra01
3/4/2015
boomster
3/6/2015
WhoaIsMe
3/7/2015
shajon123
3/11/2015
east2west
3/13/2015
jane the dood
3/13/2015
Moonchime
3/16/2015
LaLaw2000
3/18/2015
CayleeAdvocate
3/19/2015
Unique
3/19/2015
angelainwi
3/26/2015
elementary
3/27/2015
cnewman
3/27/2015
Gilligan
3/31/2015
YESorNO
3/31/2015
niner
3/31/2015
MindMatters
4/1/2015
Marshmallow
4/1/2015
byo
4/1/2015
MsJosie
4/1/2015
Steely Dan
4/3/2015
Bernina
4/5/2015
gogrannypop
4/8/2015
janx
4/8/2015
DebinGA
4/10/2015
FinallyRegistered
4/15/2015
Curious in Indiana
4/15/2015
pinkandgreenmom
4/15/2015
Soulsad
4/20/2015
Hatfield
4/20/2015
tcrockett
4/21/2015

4/21/2015
Ruby
4/29/2015
Moonchime
5/2/2015
Foghorn
5/8/2015
Grammieto5
5/13/2015
zqtpie
5/14/2015
daisydomino
5/14/2015
zqtpie
5/15/2015
Frigga
6/4/2015
TxJan1971
6/4/2015

6/6/2015
memoriesbymichelle
6/10/2015
rose222
6/25/2015
TorisMom003
9/30/2015
gerryl42



Have you sent in your "bet"? Here's the poll http://goo.gl/forms/o6O5Qbu6ic
 
The very fact that Sherry is terrified of an appeal is ample evidence she is incompetent as a judge.
 
Could someone please correct me if my thinking is wrong?

Does tomorrow start at 8:30 with the media stuff then court at 10:30 with possibly Sue or BN or Geffner or JA?

I just want to make sure I'm here on time "refreshing" with the rest of you. TIA

The nice thing about the way things have gone is the jury will be much fresher on the states case than the defense, JMO.

I'm gonna stick out my neck and say that yes, that is correct ~
But I don't think any of has to be on time tomorrow as they never are :smile:
 
I am wondering if Jodi told Travis she had insuranced the BMW....so he took the coverage off, and the car was trashed with no insurance and Jodi told Travis, sorry but there is no signed contract, the problem is yours.



IF she wasn't buying it, why would she insure it though?
 
Nurmi wouldn't have needed to depose BN; he can freely meet and talk to him whenever he wants. But maybe Nurmi had never asked BN any difficult questions...

Iirc at least one of the "expert" DT witnesses said they'd been told not to keep notes...
 
Something tells me she might not rule in Jodi's favor thus exposing herself to the real possibility of being overturned by a higher court, because she doesn't really present herself as a kind of person who would take the most pragmatic route.

The safest bet for her in my humble opinion wound be to rule in Jodi's favor, dismiss this case, call for the entire-case retrial and let Jodi be someone else's pain in the *advertiser censored*. At least this is what I would have done if I had been stuck in her shoes.


All I will say is, thank God you aren't stuck in her shoes.
 
And AZlawyer said JSS does NOT have to wait on the supreme court. FYI to Steely.

But...............she *may* be playing it safe, just in case. (Doubt the Supreme court will over rule the COA) But just what if? "Secret witnesses testify in public, other witnesses refuse, then the ASC says the COA was WRONG.
Trial is dead in the water.

Better to err on the side of caution, even if there's only a 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 1/2% of a chance that ASC will Not over rule the COA.
 
I've had a Trojan on my computer before, they are nasty in what destruction they will do to your computer. I no longer use that Desktop to access the internet anymore because it was turned into a slave and sending out e-mail viruses to people in my contact list, even ones I hadn't contacted in over 10 years! I got it from opening an e-mail I didn't recognize that got onto my computer.

After reading the article on Facebook's Juan Martinez concerning TA computer etc. I asked the IT person at the school I volunteer, some questions. This article was spot on. Also, when I asked him about the incinerator he looks at me and says that does not make any since unless it was by accident and of course on purpose which was done when the law was at your door.. why erase? The defense would not incinerate the *advertiser censored*, so my guess it is something TA wrote....Another thing we talked about was the *advertiser censored* in itself and his thought that that would be a big mistake for the defense anyway, unless it was child *advertiser censored*, because who cares.....I am sure there is at least one male on the jury who has looked at *advertiser censored*. He also said that once you have malware or a trojan on the computer you never get rid of it, it is always there unless you totally set fire to the hard drive. It literally cost thousands of dollars to erase any malware completely from the computer. I am betting the CD incident where TA suppose to slam it to the wall probably happened because this IT person said that is another thing that happened during that time, Was the sharing of CD's with the malware embedded onto the CD. My bet is CMJA knew that CD had this Malware on it and that was why TA was pissed.
 
SCxTrOC.png

2/27/2015
slinkpod
2/28/2015
myvice
3/4/2015
Tsitra01
3/4/2015
boomster
3/6/2015
WhoaIsMe
3/7/2015
shajon123
3/11/2015
east2west
3/13/2015
jane the dood
3/13/2015
Moonchime
3/16/2015
LaLaw2000
3/18/2015
CayleeAdvocate
3/19/2015
Unique
3/19/2015
angelainwi
3/26/2015
elementary
3/27/2015
cnewman
3/27/2015
Gilligan
3/31/2015
YESorNO
3/31/2015
niner
3/31/2015
MindMatters
4/1/2015
Marshmallow
4/1/2015
byo
4/1/2015
MsJosie
4/1/2015
Steely Dan
4/3/2015
Bernina
4/5/2015
gogrannypop
4/8/2015
janx
4/8/2015
DebinGA
4/10/2015
FinallyRegistered
4/15/2015
Curious in Indiana
4/15/2015
pinkandgreenmom
4/15/2015
Soulsad
4/20/2015
Hatfield
4/20/2015
tcrockett
4/21/2015

4/21/2015
Ruby
4/29/2015
Moonchime
5/2/2015
Foghorn
5/8/2015
Grammieto5
5/13/2015
zqtpie
5/14/2015
daisydomino
5/14/2015
zqtpie
5/15/2015
Frigga
6/4/2015
TxJan1971
6/4/2015

6/6/2015
memoriesbymichelle
6/10/2015
rose222
6/25/2015
TorisMom003
9/30/2015
gerryl42



Have you sent in your "bet"? Here's the poll http://goo.gl/forms/o6O5Qbu6ic

I took Feb 2. The date that Jodi says they became "official". IMO she will learn of her death sentence on that date
 
No can do grammie, you have to file a motion for this change and based on the complexity of your request it will be weeks before a hearing can be scheduled to address this issue :giggle: . . . I am thinking/hoping mid February.

In addition, grammie, the motion, the hearing and the ruling will be sealed until after the verdict is reached. :cheers:
 
Death penalty, LWOP.. I don't care anymore as long as she gets sentenced. Would love it if TA's family spoke again- this time directly to the psycho.
 
I took Feb 2. The date that Jodi says they became "official". IMO she will learn of her death sentence on that date

Daisy Domino.

I voted Feb 13. I don't see my name on the list. Did you get it?
 
I'm an optimists.............I put $5 on the 1st week of April. :floorlaugh:

Seriously, I'm NOT joking.:thinking:


You are an optimist, Bernina.

I don't see any way forward where the especially cruel lying torture murderess is sentenced prior to Summer of 2015.

And I'm serious as well.

I don't think we're anywhere near the end of LKN/JW/JA motions.

In fact, I believe counsel is billing the State for the time it takes to sit around and make them up.

I think this re-trial started out with JSKS feeling guilty about making LKN stay on the case, so she was secretly pulling for him.

But over time I believe she began to tire of JM while simultaneously developing personal feelings for JA.

And now she's overtly pulling for the murderess.

How do we know that in the all-too-frequent sidebars and private discussions in chambers, JSKS isn't suggesting (or at least strongly hinting at) additional motions which could be filed and/or rulings appealed?
 
So I've been wondering, when the jury comes back will the murderer be sentenced at that time, on that day?

That's a great question, one I've often thought about. If the jury doesn't do DP, how long do we wait for the judge to sentence her? Weeks, months?
 
Daisy Domino.

I voted Feb 13. I don't see my name on the list. Did you get it?

Edited. I'm confused, lol!

This is what I have now:

1/31/2015
Netbrsr
2/2/2015TexMex
2/5/2015AZLawyer
2/10/2015hindsight2020
2/11/2015ohreally
2/13/2015NashBridges2
2/18/2015Snowshuze
2/18/2015Holidayy
2/26/2015Hope4More
2/27/2015slinkpod
2/28/2015myvice
2/28/2015Dmacky ; )
3/4/2015Tsitra01
3/4/2015boomster
3/6/2015WhoaIsMe
3/6/2015amster
3/7/2015shajon123
3/11/2015east2west
3/13/2015jane the dood
3/13/2015Moonchime
3/15/2015Jamais
3/16/2015LaLaw2000
3/18/2015CayleeAdvocate
3/18/2015Mystymiss
3/18/2015franquerolane
3/19/2015Unique
3/19/2015angelainwi
3/26/2015elementary
3/27/2015cnewman
3/27/2015Gilligan
3/31/2015YESorNO
3/31/2015niner
3/31/2015MindMatters
4/1/2015Marshmallow
4/1/2015byo
4/1/2015MsJosie
4/1/2015Steely Dan
4/3/2015Bernina
4/5/2015gogrannypop
4/8/2015janx
4/8/2015DebinGA
4/10/2015FinallyRegistered
4/15/2015Curious in indiana
4/15/2015Curious in Indiana
4/15/2015pinkandgreenmom
4/15/2015Soulsad
4/20/2015Hatfield
4/20/2015tcrockett
4/21/2015
4/21/2015Ruby
4/29/2015Moonchime
5/2/2015Foghorn
5/8/2015Grammieto5
5/13/2015zqtpie
5/14/2015daisydomino
5/14/2015zqtpie
5/15/2015Frigga
6/4/2015TxJan1971
6/4/2015
6/6/2015memoriesbymichelle
6/10/2015rose222
6/25/2015TorisMom003
9/30/2015gerryl42

Not sure why I have Curious in Indiana twice, but this is what I have. I'm not going to edit any more lol
 
You are an optimist, Bernina.

I don't see any way forward where the especially cruel lying torture murderess is sentenced prior to Summer of 2015.

And I'm serious as well.

I don't think we're anywhere near the end of LKN/JW/JA motions.

In fact, I believe counsel is billing the State for the time it takes to sit around and make them up.

I think this re-trial started out with JSKS feeling guilty about making LKN stay on the case, so she was secretly pulling for him.

But over time I believe she began to tire of JM while simultaneously developing personal feelings for JA.

And now she's overtly pulling for the murderess.

How do we know that in the all-too-frequent sidebars and private discussions in chambers, JSKS isn't suggesting (or at least strongly hinting at) additional motions which could be filed and/or rulings appealed?

I don't believe that at all. Because sidebars and stuff will be released in the future (as the original trial sidebar transcript were last year) and if it turns out that's what she did, I very much doubt she would be allowed even judging karoake competitions at her local bar.
 
While we're moving kinda slow here I'd like to ask if anyone has any advice pertaining to the "thanks" button.

I know it usually comes back if you refresh but sometimes it takes so long for the page to come back up when I refresh it. Anyone have any tricks up their sleeve? I'd be most grateful!!
 
I agree, it certainly seems that the DT are hoping JM loses focus on what needs to be crossed with the current outstanding "expert" witnesses by keeping him busy with these, imo, nothing but bs arguments/motions etc, to render the witnesses' very biased(largely due to lack of either the facts in the case, or expertise) testimonies useless in the DT's closing.

Good luck with that Jodi!

Juan outclassed you the first time and made you look like a fool.

No wonder you don't want to do it again.
 
I can't believe no one took Feb 14th. You could get a shirt (or underwear) that says
TRAVIS ALEXANDER'S
on one side and on the other says
KILLER SENTENCED TO DEATH
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
234
Guests online
3,604
Total visitors
3,838

Forum statistics

Threads
592,942
Messages
17,978,145
Members
228,953
Latest member
Aprilssister94
Back
Top