It came from AB's interview with an engineer or expert of the type of tank involved. It was discussed a lot at the first part of thread #33.
Children being revived and recovering without Ill effects is a fairly common news story. Usually it's a drowning or an accident, but the outcome is the same. So, why didn't he try to save the children? Easy answer; he killed them!
If memory serves, he did not "confess" until after the drone footage and bedsheet were seen near what looked like a shallow grave. I do not know if they had already gone to the grave site, but I believe he knew his goose was cooked because they had located the approximate site of the remains and he would be the only culprit, given the locked up house and security camera footage he already knew he was dealing with...it certainly did not seem like a conscience come clean, IMO.
Wow, if this is correct, the last few threads, about 8 inch diameter, had us, down the 'garden path'.
Recently in Chicago a presumed dead victim on the street sidewalk had a sheet placed over him by the emt and police while they tried to help other alive victims.
Desperation and adrenaline make powerful weapons.
Jodi Arias' hired psychologist testified that she created an alternative universe (also mentioned she disassociated from her crime, iirc) as a defense mechanism. So she was able to laugh, giggle, lie after the murder.
I still believe the original reports of his admitting he killed all of them was what he actually said, and the only mistake was that it was reported by LE and a family member before the actual confession was signed or the final affidavit was written. And before he changed his story after speaking to his father. Jmo
IMO, it is simply the best available educated guess (by an expert on AB show) we have been shown. But also IMO I do not see how it should change whether the evidence points squarely at him at the sole murderer we know of to date.
IMO: He saw "actively strangling" so it would fit a rage/passion downgrade of the murder of his wife and unborn child and on the monitor so as to create a tiny bit of leeway that it sparked the rage...but not in time to "save" the child (did not happen in front of him - had to run to room and "discover" deed was done).
Where did you find this? The people familiar with the specific oil barrels they were found in were the original source for this. What other source did you find? Are you sure you are not thinking of the holes near the bottom?
CW needed NO special knowledge or eqipment to dial 911, push the panic button, or scream for help! As a loving parent (read all the numerous posts on all the threads) he had every reason and need to believe his unconscious child could be helped! It's beyond amazing what loving parents have done. It's beyond belief what he failed to do.
But CW was a lot larger than SW, would not have needed a shoe to hit her with, just shoving or pulling her by all her hair, jumping on her, elbows, punching, whatever. Not necessarily a weapon needed. I know you were talking about being in that situation as a woman, but you'd have to make the man much smaller than the woman to equate to what might have happened in this case. Anyway, as another poster mentioned (sorry I have forgotten who) it seems obvious to many of us that even if it started as he said, he was much more intent on killing her than saving anyone else.
Yes, what is the source for the bigger size? Maybe poster is referring to the other holes, with 64 bolts, on the bottom, which would require the tanks to be drained and filled back up again?
