erzulirose
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2015
- Messages
- 117
- Reaction score
- 386
It did, but there are two other minors involved.Rachel's marriage emancipated her.
It did, but there are two other minors involved.Rachel's marriage emancipated her.
It did, but there are two other minors involved.
If "TT" legally declaired dead, divorced & remarried all ties to would be severed to Rachel. "As in his first wife" and multipals there after. As long as all done legally it would seem. EX spouses have no say in anything.The family releasing information (false information) shouldn't legally be able to access it through FWPD. The next of kin for Rachel is TT. Please correct me if I'm wrong
Working on itWe sure could use some of you to become verified insiders. We could then talk about things that at this moment are basically off limits. It’s not that hard to be verified and you will not lose your anonymity either.
Verification Process for Professional or Insider Posters
Wor
Working on it
Absolutely NotOut of the Three, is there one that is least remembered?
Everyone has their own theories.... It would just be nice to finally have justice for the girls and their families.I think whoever took them was primarily interested in the teenage girls and Julie was just taken to eliminate a witness. I don't think it was a child molester.
Kettlecorn, that’s great he wants to contact LE. Hopefully you guys get some information and answers..
I have been following this case for more than a year on this site and the other. Read lots about it anywhere and everywhere I can find information, listened to podcast and am familiar with most of the theories out there.
I have a few of my own theories as well.. Although Nothing Crazy..
In my personal opinion Rachel’s marriage was probably not even past the honeymoon stage, I can imagine them both being young and infactuated with each other.
It’s extremely hard to believe the husband could commit such a crime against Rachel and 2 other innocent young girls and then live a normal life, with no more troubles with the law.. In my opinion he was at the bottom of my list as a suspect. And never really viewed as one.
Just want to say thanks for being here with your insight and allowing us to ask questions and you answering questions..
I think there is "enough." If the best person for the job were given a private conference room with big blank walls, a full-time assistant, and three months to organize the contents of the case file - with an emphasis on the first 21 days. And; if the best person for the job were provided, after that investigation, is allowed to keep working; that person could get to the promised land. 3 months - 1st 21 days.What more, besides the letter and envelope, do you think is there?
Wow if someone wants me out of this discussion, they have succeeded. There's nothing really left to talk about. I rather not risk getting banned. I don't want WS to be sued either. RIP girls.