It just seems odd that on a dispatch log, police would make assumptions rather than recording simple facts. These logs are used as evidence in court, so one would presume they have to be accurate. Other possibilities exist as to who answered the door. They may be unlikely, but it just seems weird to state that, when it isn't actually known. Why mention answering the door at all? Could have just said 'door kicked in', and 'victim is deceased right inside the doorway'. And yes, thank you, impossible to catch up on all the conversation. (impossible to even keep up with it ongoing!)I know you're late to the party and trying to catch up, but this call log has been dissected ad nauseum for about two months now. James did not answer the door for police because he was already dead. Sheriff, in the DM interview, said both James and Denise were killed instantly by the perp. So he could not have been alive to answer the door for police.
Last edited: