I believe you may be referring to Count 16 of the 4 Ws indictments (linked above) which reads as follows (it will not allow me to copy and paste, but please feel free to compare):
[Defendant's name], on or about April 3, 2016, at the County of Pike, and in the State of Ohio, did unlawfully, knowing that an official proceeding or investigation was in progress, or was about to be or likely to be instituted, MAKE, PRESENT, *OR* (emphasis mine) USE any record, document, or thing, to wit: custody documents, k owing it to be false and with purpose to mislead a public official who is or may be engaged in such proceeding or investigation, ow with purpose to corrupt the outcome of any such proceeding or investigation, in violation of Section 2921.12(A)(2)/2921.12(B) of the Ohio Revised Code.
TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE - A FELONY OF THE THIRD DEGREE.
My opinion: ...make, present, or use....with purpose to...mislead a public official who is or may be...
with purpose to corrupt the outcome...."
"...make" is consistent with on or about April 3, 2016.
"...with purpose to mislead..." is not a direct act
"...a public official..." - very broad term, perhaps a judge? Again, it doesn't matter because it doesn't cite an official was mislead, but only that that was the purpose of the custody documents...
I am not trying to argue with anyone. Only trying to discuss facts and not read things that just aren't there.
I respect each and every poster and your views. Thank you all posters for considering my views and opinions. Especially thank you to the Moderators of this forum who give us this opportunity.