TaylorCallum
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2019
- Messages
- 605
- Reaction score
- 3,770
Peter A SmithVerified account @PeterAdamSmith 3m3 minutes ago
The defence for the teenage killer begins arguing against identifying him. Says there’s a credible threat and a “price on his head.” Judge asks: if that threat already exists, how does identifying him change that? Defence argues it risks exacerbating the situation.
I think the argument is as per the next tweet - some people know who the murderer is and there is a threat against him.
If the name is revealed, everyone knows who he is and there may be many more threats - greater danger to him
Ah I see. But isn't he under 24/7 supervision anyway and doesn't interact with others?