Found Deceased UK - Libby Squire, 21, last seen outside Welly club, Hull, 31 Jan 2019 #16 *ARREST*

Status
Not open for further replies.

cybervampira

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
15,973
Reaction score
68,921
Missing woman Libby Squire | Humberside Police

Can you help find missing Libby Squire (21) last seen getting into a taxi outside Welly club in Hull at around 11pm last night?

She is 5ft 7ins tall with shoulder length brown hair and was wearing a black long sleeved top, leather jacket and black denim skirt with lace.

If you have seen her please call 101 quoting log 29 of 01/02/19.

upload_2019-2-2_10-21-48.jpegupload_2019-2-2_10-25-38.jpeg

Humberside Police

Woman, 21, missing after last being seen getting into taxi on night out

Huge search for missing Libby Squire continues

MEDIA MAPS & TIMELINE *NO DISCUSSION*

Thread #1
Thread #2
Thread #3
Thread #4
Thread #5
Thread #6
Thread #7
Thread #8
Thread #9
Thread #10
Thread #11
Thread #12
Thread #13
Thread #14

Thread #15
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Admin note:
Websleuths operates differently than other sites. It may be difficult to understand our rules in the beginning but when you have been here awhile you begin to appreciate the reasoning behind the rules. Primarily, we respect the integrity of a case by keeping out rumors and we also uphold protecting the innocent and peripheral players in a case.

New members need to read the following terms of service in their entirety. Members are responsible for knowing our rules and posting accordingly.

Rules - Etiquette & Information

Please be mindful of the following:
* We do not sleuth people who have not been named by LE as suspects or POI's.

* We do not link to social networking pages of people who have not been named by LE as suspects/POI.

* We never post the name of a private individual, minor or adult, who has not been named in the media.

* Questions about the rules or moderation should be addressed to a mod in a private message called a conversation. DO NOT discuss them in the thread.

* If you see a post that violates TOS, do not reply as it will cause a huge clean up for mods. Alert the post so a mod can look at the post.

* If you quote a post which later is removed by a mod, your post is subject to removal, as well.


 
Here is some information regarding our social media rules in case you missed it on the last thread.

Approved SM Pages/Profiles

Individuals
Victim (missing or murdered person)
Suspect (as indicated by LE)


  • Links may be used to direct members to posts made by a victim or a suspect.
  • Copying and pasting, or taking screen caps, directly from these pages is not allowed.
  • Paraphrasing is okay.
  • Posts by friends and visitors are off limits.
  • Do not link to an individual’s (victim or suspect) social media page if you are not 100% certain it belongs to the correct individual.
  • If a social media page is set to private and you get in the back way, you may not post what you find. Private means private!

Public Pages
Mainstream Media (MSM)
Law Enforcement (LE)
Group support pages for victims, such as "Help Find..." and "Justice for...”
Legitimate non-profit organizations who provide assistance and support to victims and their families (e.g., Klass Kids, Texas Equusearch).


  • Links may be used to direct members to a post by the owner or an admin of an approved social media page/profile.
  • Posts by an owner or admin may be copied or quoted. This refers primarly to posts or tweets by MSM reporters, and announcements by law enforcement, the immediate family, or the admin of a group support page.
  • Paraphrasing is okay.
  • ***NOTE: Comments and posts by readers/visitors of these pages are not allowed to be quoted, copied or referenced. Just don’t mention them.
  • Regarding group support pages, i.e., "Help Find..." and "Justice for...”: If at any time the WS staff determines a group support page to be inappropriate, a notice will be posted in the thread stating that the page is no longer approved.

Not Allowed

Social media pages that fall in the following categories are OFF LIMITS.

Family members of either a victim or a suspect
Friends of either a victim or a suspect
Most any other individual


Don't link to these pages, nor make reference to information you find on them.

In summary, only the bolded blue are allowed to be discussed here.

If anyone is still not clear about the rules please contact me or another moderator via private message/conversation before posting.
 
Just bringing this forward from thread #2

Timeline:

11:18pm Libby turned away from Welly,
11:22pm Libby put in taxi
11:29 Taxi drops her near home on Wellesley Av. Neighbours saw her stumbling in street.
11:40 - 11:45 caught on CCTV on bench. Around this time grey beard man stopped to offer assistance, she declined, police have cleared him
11:49ish PR? car arrives on Haworth Street (per ITV CCTV)
12:04-12:06 ish man smoking (CCTV)
12:08 passenger door opens and someone/something is on passenger seat
(CCTV)
12:09 car drives away (CCTV)

12:09 police say Libby had left the bench by now
12:19 the same car (tbc) seen Newland Av (per Sun CCTV)
12:15-12:30ish dark and eerie screams coming from park for 15 minutes
12:30ish man seen running from park
12:30ish scream and banging gate heard from Heathcote St near Libbys house.
 
Continue discussion here.. If you are new be sure to read post #2 and 3. As an aside, Websleuths is fact based. Rumor from social media or local chatter is not allowed and will be removed.
 
Not sure where this guy in spidercam wearing pointy boots has come from, we've had wellies and trainers of varying descriptions from memory, perhaps i have a different version of spidercam to poster? i agree with newthoughts as to wether it is or isnt PR in spidercam LE never asked person/persons in vid to come forward, neither did they for running man in park (surely a star witness if its not PR) and again heathcote/wellesley screams no plea for them to come forward. is this not a bit odd or did LE already know this could have been PR, LIBBY AND ACCOMPLICE. jmo.
 
Which of those things leads you to feel accomplice? I really struggle with the accomplice thing
Any of the above could have involved him alone
LE's last update mentioned they were using search experts. That could just imply they were looking for premeditation by examining websites he'd looked at - eg tide times, houses for let, violent *advertiser censored*. Or it could perhaps imply examining emails and texts?

The Heatcote screams witness did refer to male voices - plural though that is easy to mishear.

Regarding the Heathcote screams - if it was relevant and there was more than 1 male voice how would they know where to go? Without wanting to place much store by the sisters interview - the putting her address in sat nav puzzled me. Could he have been sending her address to someone else.
 
LE's last update mentioned they were using search experts. That could just imply they were looking for premeditation by examining websites he'd looked at - eg tide times, houses for let, violent *advertiser censored*. Or it could perhaps imply examining emails and texts?

The Heatcote screams witness did refer to male voices - plural though that is easy to mishear.

Regarding the Heathcote screams - if it was relevant and there was more than 1 male voice how would they know where to go? Without wanting to place much store by the sisters interview - the putting her address in sat nav puzzled me. Could he have been sending her address to someone else.

I thought the heathcote screams only referred to "muffled" voices rather than specifically Male? So could have been PR and Libby ?

I would have thought the putting in satnav was just PR finding her address ..or more likely pretending to be professional or helpful...I'm not sure how him putting her address in his own satnav helps the accomplice theory
 
I feel an accomplice is possible only in a way that absolutely anything is possible.. there has not been anything from LE or press to positively endorce the possibility..for example...no photo fits or requests to identify another person
They have never took anyone else in for questioning etc ..of course things could be going on behind the scenes..but until that is released if ever so nothing positively endorce the fact
 
I thought the heathcote screams only referred to "muffled" voices rather than specifically Male? So could have been PR and Libby ?

I would have thought the putting in satnav was just PR finding her address ..or more likely pretending to be professional or helpful...I'm not sure how him putting her address in his own satnav helps the accomplice theory
He would have known her road given he's been charged with a crime there so I'm trying to why work out why it came up in MSM interview with his sister. All I could think of was him texting it to someone rather than putting it in sat nav. That does fall down in Spidercam showing him driving off quickly - so anything he did would have to have happened between the bench and him getting back to car. Also LE would know the difference between sat nav and text.

But LE using search experts so clearly his usage of IT is of interest. Does anyone with tech knowledge know if putting stuff into a sat nav or Google maps could be transmitted to someone else?
 
I feel an accomplice is possible only in a way that absolutely anything is possible.. there has not been anything from LE or press to positively endorce the possibility..for example...no photo fits or requests to identify another person
They have never took anyone else in for questioning etc ..of course things could be going on behind the scenes..but until that is released if ever so nothing positively endorce the fact
My main reasons for wondering if he had an accomplice rests on:

The amount of time it took to find Libby - despite a massive police search of the river - plus doubts about whether she could have got to where she was found from where LE were searching.

The fact LE are still working on it and have said it is complex when it looks straightforward. If Libby went into the water that night in the vicinity of the park which they seem to search a lot, given just what we knew, they have a good circumstantial case IMO

Using search experts. That could be to prove premeditation. Or it could be to look at a communication trail.

But those are just opinions.
 
Not sure where this guy in spidercam wearing pointy boots has come from, we've had wellies and trainers of varying descriptions from memory, perhaps i have a different version of spidercam to poster?

The guy in the spidercam video (here below) at the 30 second mark is wearing pointy boots with almost no sole.

They are very distinctive.

Boxer or wrestler boots are appropriate. Wellies are not pointy like that.

Boxers and wrestlers do their stuff on canvas (the boxing ring) or mats (wrestlers) respectively, and I guess that both boxers and wrestlers are unlikely to wear their boots outside of those places, but MMA boots, are almost the same and are worn on the wooden floored octagon, which make them more outdoor friendly.

mma boots - Google Search

If I were a prosecutor then I would argue that the wearing of such boots outside of the octagon suggests premeditation - they are boots for combative situations: fighting, controlling, and rape.
 
The guy in the spidercam video (here below) at the 30 second mark is wearing pointy boots with almost no sole.

They are very distinctive.

Boxer or wrestler boots are appropriate. Wellies are not pointy like that.

Boxers and wrestlers do their stuff on canvas (the boxing ring) or mats (wrestlers) respectively, and I guess that both boxers and wrestlers are unlikely to wear their boots outside of those places, but MMA boots, are almost the same and are worn on the wooden floored octagon, which make them more outdoor friendly.

mma boots - Google Search

If I were a prosecutor then I would argue that the wearing of such boots outside of the octagon suggests premeditation - they are boots for combative situations: fighting, controlling, and rape.
If PR had any sense he'll have destroyed whatever he was wearing that night

However LE have stated that the court case for the 13 unrelated charges will include 90 witnesses and CCTV. It will be interesting to see if any of those show similar attire.
 
I wish we could have *ARREST* taken off the title, so that we know when a charge is made for THIS crime.
 
I'm still checking in every now and then, though it doesn't feel like there's much to discuss at the moment without going in circles.

PR's next hearing to review the case before trial is coming up on June 18th.
 
I'm still checking in every now and then, though it doesn't feel like there's much to discuss at the moment without going in circles.

PR's next hearing to review the case before trial is coming up on June 18th.[/QUOTE Good reminder @Vernon24
 
LE's last update mentioned they were using search experts. That could just imply they were looking for premeditation by examining websites he'd looked at - eg tide times, houses for let, violent *advertiser censored*. Or it could perhaps imply examining emails and texts?

The term search specialists usually means those trained to carry out physical (as opposed to online) searches of people, buildings, vehicles, sometimes also as dog handlers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
3,944
Total visitors
4,066

Forum statistics

Threads
592,405
Messages
17,968,476
Members
228,767
Latest member
Mona Lisa
Back
Top