While it would seem (timing wise) that the money would be coming from the lawyer, would this actually make sense? If the lawyer is doing the work pro bono, why would he pony up the money to get his client out? Is there any chance at all that he would be repaid?I think his lawyer will front it for him. JMO
afitzy-you are just a gem. Your sleuthing skills are unparalleled!While trolling the State of CT Judiciary website looking to confirm tomorrow's court date, I found this case which was settled by arbitration for $50,000 against FD who ran into someone (rear ended the plaintiff) on I84 at high speed. http://civilinquiry.jud.ct.gov/DocumentInquiry/DocumentInquiry.aspx?DocumentNo=15438199
No update in the court documents that the $50,000 was paid by FD.
“I’m told by people with information that the girlfriend was never at the New Canaan home that day — the day the wife went missing — and that she can prove she never was there and that law enforcement may be satisfied,” Pattis said on the radio show. “That is a very significant fact in this case."
Norm Pattis: Michelle Troconis not in New Canaan day Jennifer Dulos went missing
Maybe I am parsing language to closely, but he said she was never at the New Canaan home that day, not that she wasn't in New Canaan. Was there another quote from a source that said she could prove she wasn't even in NC that day?
I came across this article yesterday that reminded me of Jennifer's case. The parallels make me wonder if a 3rd person that was owed money could have killed her. The only thing that makes this hard to believe is that in the Dulos case, the husband was caught on camera disposing of trash bags with her blood in them, which makes him seem very culpable. Unless, as someone pointed out earlier, the 3rd person who murdered Jennifer actually cleaned up the crime scene and delivered her body and other evidence to the husband. I hope the court case sheds light on what actually happened and brings closure to this family. It's all so very sad.
California man guilty of killing family of 4 found in... | Daily Mail Online
The man found guilty of murdering this entire family (Husband, Wife & 2 children) was a business associate of the Husband. The Husband owed him $42,000. He killed this entire family over being owed money. Additionally, he removed their bodies from the site where he killed them. He then abandoned their car near the Mexico border, which made police think that the family had just decided to move to Mexico. This sounds similar to how Jennifer's car was found abandoned at Waveny Park. Their murders happened in 2010, but went unsolved until 2013 when hikers found their skeletal remains, along with the murder weapon, buried in a shallow grave somewhere.
While it would seem (timing wise) that the money would be coming from the lawyer, would this actually make sense? If the lawyer is doing the work pro bono, why would he pony up the money to get his client out? Is there any chance at all that he would be repaid?
There wasn't last week. We stalked Twitter for updates instead. Haven't heard if it's different this week.What is the best way to watch this live? Is there a live feed somewhere?
Can I just say I love this post. Very witty but true!
It was the other way around. The killer owed the husband money and was caught writing himself checks from the business.I came across this article yesterday that reminded me of Jennifer's case. The parallels make me wonder if a 3rd person that was owed money could have killed her. The only thing that makes this hard to believe is that in the Dulos case, the husband was caught on camera disposing of trash bags with her blood in them, which makes him seem very culpable. Unless, as someone pointed out earlier, the 3rd person who murdered Jennifer actually cleaned up the crime scene and delivered her body and other evidence to the husband. I hope the court case sheds light on what actually happened and brings closure to this family. It's all so very sad.
California man guilty of killing family of 4 found in... | Daily Mail Online
The man found guilty of murdering this entire family (Husband, Wife & 2 children) was a business associate of the Husband. The Husband owed him $42,000. He killed this entire family over being owed money. Additionally, he removed their bodies from the site where he killed them. He then abandoned their car near the Mexico border, which made police think that the family had just decided to move to Mexico. This sounds similar to how Jennifer's car was found abandoned at Waveny Park. Their murders happened in 2010, but went unsolved until 2013 when hikers found their skeletal remains, along with the murder weapon, buried in a shallow grave somewhere.
Inthedetails said: ↑
Exactly. There is something weird about the business that many WSers are picking up on. We can't quite put our finger on it, imo, because we are honest people who understand how regular businesses function....and this isn't a regularly-run business and my suspicion is that it isn't honest either. IMO
Speculation only. Thinking aloud.
jmo
He had to do something with all that money he borrowed from his FIL / building showy houses and listing for a small fortune makes sense to me when you consider the alternative / he had to pay his FIL back when they sold - free money until then -all JMO (ex borrow 500k from FIL spend 200k out of pocket on remodel net 300k -hidebin greece or wherever - list property for 4 million/ never sells never pay back the 500k)? Pretty good while it lasts IMO
That was the case up until last year when the new tax laws went into effect. Now she can collect income overseas and not pay US income taxes.@gitana1
Re: Taxes
Correct. She’d have to pay taxes wherever she was working. BUT, if working in Venezuela et al, while maintaining US citizenship, she would still have to pay taxes to US for her income. Tax law was a long time ago for me, but lamely got a refresher when reading up on Megan Markle. Who else sees “Megan’s Tax Requirements” and thinks, ‘ooohh...’? Just me?
& I in no way think she renounced citizenship. Someone asked why she would need a visa to be employed if she were born in TN. The answer to that would be she renounced her citizenship. I don’t know that she had a visa. It is just completely possible she could have been born in the US, AND needs a visa.
While it would seem (timing wise) that the money would be coming from the lawyer, would this actually make sense? If the lawyer is doing the work pro bono, why would he pony up the money to get his client out? Is there any chance at all that he would be repaid?