ITA, The cat comment is unfair. IMO, ML intended to meet up with this guy.....and then go home. She would feed the cat when she got home, perhaps by daylight.
(sanpaku eek)
A woman could've met her in the park, perhaps her partner-to-be in any activity for that night. That is a very good possibility.
I just wonder what he would have to tell her to get her agreement to that. I also don't know that she knew they would be going to that house. If they did. There might be something else that we just can't see.
This is why i think he met or picked her up at the park. That way, if they did go back to his house, it’s only his car pulling into the home or parking lot. You would just have to hope no one saw her getting out of the car and walking into the home. Does his home have a garage or a garage that is attached? I met a guy before who had me meet him at a parking lot, picked me up in his car, then we drove to and into his attached garage. He didn’t want his neighbors seeing anyone else arriving. Just a thought.
I've been asking the same question with no clear answer. I have not found a single source indicating that there is a link between them, nor seen any evidence cited that he was the one she met up with at the park. There is a lot of rampant speculation on this thread but to this point, that's all it is.
There is a real effect if you try to open your eyes like that. Heightened awareness, like you're waiting for an incoming attack. It may even travel from person to person like a yawn would. I think it's a built in communication for us humans.
If her SD was married and she had roomates they needed a place.....what better place than a $40 a night BNB. After that all bets were off with what the POI did. Someone else knows something. IMOA woman could've met her in the park, perhaps her partner-to-be in any activity for that nigh. That is a very good possibility.
It could have been like this - "Meet 'Jane' at the park and she'll take you to my place."
And that would mean, someone else might be part of the plan, or someone else might be another victim.
jmopinion, thinking aloud
Uber had been in the news previously because of the fake Uber driver. Not even their fault, but they had to address their safety procedures.Lyft you mean. Lyft takes great pride I’m sure I’m not being “those other guys”. But I hear ya, grateful indeed!!! And they should be. They go to great lengths to be a reputable company from what I understand, unlike those oooooother guys with maaaajor infractions such as background check violations, etc. Posting link again for reference:
Uber fined $8.9 million in Colorado for problematic background checks
ETA:
Uggggh don’t think I’ve seen this one:
CNN investigation: 103 Uber drivers accused of sexual assault or abuse )
Just guessing, but I think what girlhasnoname was referring to was all the negative publicity Uber received after Samantha Josephson's murder. MOOLyft you mean. Lyft takes great pride I’m sure I’m not being “those other guys”. But I hear ya, grateful indeed!!! And they should be. They go to great lengths to be a reputable company from what I understand, unlike those oooooother guys with maaaajor infractions such as background check violations, etc. Posting link again for reference:
Uber fined $8.9 million in Colorado for problematic background checks
ETA:
Uggggh don’t think I’ve seen this one:
CNN investigation: 103 Uber drivers accused of sexual assault or abuse )
