Agree. There is a reason he buried her body instead of calling LE when she died.
That reason was of benefit to him, and he hoped to get away with whatever he did to Savannah.
JMO
Morning Molly, and all!
Ita!
Imo, none of his actions points to this being accidental. Everything we know right now, which is only a tiny bit, points to the murder of Savannah.
I also don't buy the argument her ankles were bound, and it happened when she was placed in a garbage bag. It's been specifically stated she was found with her ankles bound. LE knows the difference in ankles being specifically bound rather than being caught up with tape around her ankles when she was put into the garbage bag or bags.
Imo, it also shows her ankles weren't bound so she could be dragged since she was removed from his apartment inside the bags, imo.
I have yet to find one hunter that has ever used shipping tape to bind the back legs of any deer. If the deer is bound by rope or whatever.. both front, and hind legs are tied.
Imo, DS bound her ankles together before she was killed so she would be unable to flee his house of horrors.
Imo, the law is clear. No one can claim when they were committing another violent felony against anyone, and then oops, try to pretend the victim was killed because they resisted.
If his DT tries this strategy it will fall quicker than a concrete block thrown off a bridge. Jurors won't buy that excuse for one nano second, imo.
People have been convicted of capital murder even for the getaway driver in an armed robbery where someone was killed inside of a bank etc. even though they weren't the shooter.
I've seen them even charged with murder if someone dies of a heart attack inside of the bank when armed robbers robbed it. Why? Because anyone who was in the middle of committing any other felony at the time is also is held accountable for the murder or death if they were killed during those felonies.
Imo, he should also be charged with kidnapping because the binding of the ankles shows Savannah was not free to leave on her own free will. Imo, Savannah knew she was in grave danger, and I don't have one doubt whatsover this poor young woman wanted to flee trying to save her life.
Imo, that's why she was bound so she wouldn't be able to do so.
I have full faith in jurors. They will not buy the koolaid arguments the DT wants them to drink. Jurors now more than ever before are onto the ridiculous claims, and excuses they come up with which defies common sense, and logic based on the evidence they have before them.
We just saw the ridiculous arguments, and unsupported smear allegations made by both Daron Wint's, and Charles Merritt's DTs. Neither jury bought the BS in either case. Imo, they won't in this one either especially if they try to blame the victim herself.
That never goes over well, and winds up ticking off the jurors highly instead.
Jurors are always mindful it's the accused WHO is on trial, and WHO the evidence is against no matter how much DTs try to distract.
Jmho
