SailorMoon
Let's go Patriots!!! Rock it Brady!
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2006
- Messages
- 3,327
- Reaction score
- 51
I really wonder why Rogers did not poll the jury?? Moot point, but they usually do.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was there ever any evidence of drug or alcohol testing on her after the murder?
I really wonder why Rogers did not poll the jury?? Moot point, but they usually do.
I thought he did. I heard him say yes I thought when he was asked. But then I wondered why it wasn't shown.I really wonder why Rogers did not poll the jury?? Moot point, but they usually do.
Speaking only for me. I did not have faith that a jury would be able to go beyond her uniform and look at the facts as I understood them. I watched the trial and became more convinced of her guilt. When the Castle Doctrine was allowed to be introduced, I saw it as a way to justify her actions while giving Mr. Jean no credit for being in his own home, minding his own business. So, in short, it was about the sway of her being an officer and the kind of investigation that was done initially. I think the charge was right and the verdict is fair.
Thought there were only 4 women. Do you have the breakdown?Family members are expected to testify about how they were affected by Jean's killing, and Guyger's defense attorneys can argue that she deserves a light sentence because she acted out of sudden fear and confusion. The judge is expected to provide guidance on sentencing law. It is unclear how long the punishment phase of the trial will last.
The jury that convicted Guyger was largely made up of women and people of color.
Jury convicts ex-police officer who fatally shot neighbor
I wonder if it just as bad for a female cop though? Most likely in this case it will be.
It's also against common sense.I don’t understand why people think this was an accidental killing. She admitted that she intended to kill him. I don’t think she was ever claiming it was an accident. She was claiming self defense, correct?
IMHO, as soon as she admitted that from outside the door she heard noises and went inside to see what the threat was, she was going to be found guilty. She put herself inside after hearing noises which is against department policy.
MOO
Mohamed Noor?I can recall another case where a LE officer was convicted and I distinctly remember that the person was going to be put in segregation from the general population. I dont know if that was just for the immediate beginning or if it was meant to be long term but I do recall in that other case they were going to segregate the person because he was a former LE officer that was now convicted.
So there may be some standard that jails and prisons follow that may segregate them at least for awhile.
She just worked a 13hour exhausting shift, it could also play a factor in her actions.I agree. Lethal force should be used judiciously, even by LEO. She was not in any danger. She could have followed protocol and called for backup.
I believe that she wanted "a kill". That type of person is wrong for law enforcement.