Because it's heavily marketed to practically everyone even though it's marginally effective and indicated for only a relatively small percentage of the population who are more likely to die from flu if they contract it. And even then, the CDC reports that the shot isn't really very effective in the elderly -- who make up the VAST proportion of the 79,400 who died from the flu -- 86% per the table linked.
Anywho, I'm pretty sure no one's consulting the Websleuths public polls forum to determine whether they should get a flu shot -- so I'm not super concerned about expressing my "dangerous" (in your opinion) opinion
“Marketed”? Health insurance companies give them out for free. They actually push them on us and they're the ones who pay for them. But they’re no cost to us. You know why? Because if enough people get them the rates of serious illnesses from flu viruses decreases substantially so less cost to the company.
Please link to a reputable cite that it’s indicated for a relatively small percentage of the population? Have you read about herd immunity?
I’ve explained how flu shots can be effective even in the long run despite faulty predictions at times when compiling the vaccine each season.
There is a reason both health insurance companies and the majority of the world’s doctors heavily promote vaccines. And it’s not some mythical kick back. It’s science.
Yes, the shots aren’t as effective for the elderly due to their immune systems but they can get higher dose shots which help and if the rest of us younger folk get the shots that helps them and others like small children and people with weakened immune systems to avoid the virus.
“Older people with weaker immune systems often have a lower protective immune response after flu vaccination compared to younger, healthier people. This can make them more susceptible to the flu. Although immune responses may be lower in the elderly, vaccine effectiveness has been similar in most flu seasons among older adults and those with chronic health conditions compared to younger, healthy adults. Despite the fact that older adults have weaker immune responses to vaccine flu vaccines, there are many reasons why people in that age group should be vaccinated each year.”
People 65 Years and Older & Influenza | CDC
Also, I’m not sure what math is used to determine that an overall 67% efficacy rate on average for the flue vaccine, 70% efficacy rate for healthy adults who get the shot and an overall rate of 66% for healthy kids ages 2-6, is “marginal” efficacy.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(11)70295-X/fulltext
And that’s combining two types of vaccines over various years when some forms are more effective and some years are better predictors. Moderately successful? Yes. Marginally? Not close.
Finally, it’s the volume of misinformed comments like yours that are insidious and have an impact on society. The anti-vaccination trope spread precisely due to the repetition of such mis-information.
I’d wear a seatbelt if it helped 67% of the time. It doesn’t make sense not to. Especially if it’s free to me.