Me either! I think there are going to be some more bombshells coming!
Yes, it does.oh wow - that means there was seepage all the way around right? how horrible for her family to hear this.
IMO
How would she know? By the number of bullets? Doesn't work that way. Anyhow, what kind of person leaves a loaded gun in the car and lends the car to someone driving a couple of states away. I don't see the gun having anything to do with anything except confirming the low level of responsibility and poor judgment of these people.Interesting that she testified that it looked like the gun had not been fired.
I guess we can finally rule out the gun having anything to do with the crime.
Imo
I think one question that the defense is sure to ask is whether the blood found in the condo was DNA tested. Otherwise, defense will likely suggest that there's no proof the blood was KB's. It could have been from a previous occupant's nosebleed.
I think one question that the defense is sure to ask is whether the blood found in the condo was DNA tested. Otherwise, defense will likely suggest that there's no proof the blood was KB's. It could have been from a previous occupant's nosebleed.
JM did not come forward until the jail recorded phone call.
Plus blood is not cicumstantial. Also PF'S LEO brother testimony. It's all adding up.
.
I wonder if Krystal was hoping to get pulled over with the expired tags and gun. "sorry, Patrick, I'm in jail, you'll have to do the clean up yourself!". I mean, what a stupid risk she took, driving her friend's car like that.So the car she drove had expired tags? Hmm. Maybe indeed she thought she could point that out as an excuse not to move the body. “I could get pulled over.”
Why would her friend let her borrow a car with expired tags? Wasn’t she afraid it would get impounded?
I'm thinking she will testify to hearing PF say he knew where to hide a body so that no-one would ever find it, and maybe to his being abusive to her daughter.
Imo
Ashley Franco is live
Oh I think they’ve tried to talk reason with him multiple times. I bet they’ve approached the DA without PF’s knowledge to test the waters of a plea deal, too. If they’re decent attorneys at all, they know how strong the case against him is. And they have read the jurors’ faces. If this trial goes all the way to jury verdict, it will only be because no deal was offered and PF knows A Hail Mary pass into the end zone is the only chance to win when a failure to throw it means a sure loss.His client is also the definition of a “short straw.”
I imagine his poor defense attorneys tried to convince PF to plead guilty early on, but he didn’t listen.
Instead, they are forced to dump water out of a sinking boat using a teaspoon.
The way the prosecution is heading, I no longer think we’re going to hear from SF.
I don’t know where she fits in anymore.
Yeah, that’s damning, even if there is no DNA.Good interview, and look at the amount of views that she is getting, good for her and her career with social media!
What struck me was that the outline in the hay met the measurements of the tote.
Wow. Still if it shows it's her blood. It adds weight to the case.I don’t want to be contrary but blood is circumstantial! DNA, fingerprints, etc. The only thing that is direct evidence is a witness who watched the crime take place or a culprit confessing.
So, “I saw James pull out a gun and shoot Mary! I ran over but she wasn’t breathing!” That’s direct evidence.
“I heard a shot and came running! I saw Mary on the ground and she wasn’t breathing! James came home an hour later and he had blood on his shirt and hands!” Blood is later tested and is found to be Mary’s. That’s circumstantial evidence.
<modsnip>
I'm not exactly sure how MG could tell her gun hadn't been fired. Gunpowder residue, lead, etc isn't visible to the naked eye. Little confused on that statement.
MOO
Wow. Still if it shows it's her blood. It adds weight to the case.