I agree with you that we will no doubt see Atty. P. attempt to create reasonable doubt with every piece of forensic evidence in this case! We have to expect this to happen as it will hit us like a tsunami at trial.
BUT, I do admit to being curious how he might be able to explain Fd DNA not only on the faucet you mention but in possibly other parts of 69/71 Welles and certainly the garage.
I have to admit that the LA testimony we heard in AW3 about how she and JD locked the doors at Welles so Fd wouldn't enter was compelling information to say that Fd wasn't allowed in Welles ever. We also saw the testimony of the Court Monitor who said that they didn't witness Fd go inside Welles either.
It will be fascinating to see exactly how much Fd related forensic evidence is found at Welles and where the experts chart out the probable path that Fd took at Welles on 5/24 and how Atty. P. can create reasonable doubt for not just one piece of evidence but blood pools in the garage that are virtually etched into the concrete via seepage even though the floor itself was wiped up. We also have the bloody footprint in the garage. Was this the bloody footprint of JFd attempting to escape, did it belong to Fd or perhaps an accomplice?
Its going to be interesting to see how this growing mountain of evidence can be countered or questioned as it no doubt will by Atty. P. and Fd and MT and KM......
MOO
