This is at the core of things, imo:
The police report states that Junior, Senior, and R had already used their trucks twice to try to box Ahmaud in /get him to stop running before their 3rd and final attempt seen on the video. In between the 2nd & 3rd attempt, Senior exited Junior's passenger seat to stand, armed, in the open truck bed.
Ahmaud has twice tried to escape them. When he approached Junior's truck from behind on the video, R is right behind him, blocking that route. Senior is now standing up in the truck's bed, facing him. Junior has already exited the truck and is standing on the left side of the road, blocking his way, holding his shotgun.
Ahmaud swerves to the right, his only open route of escape. Junior moves from where he was standing, to the front of the truck, shotgun in hand, and according to DA Barnhill, with his finger already on the trigger.
Junior, Senior, and R were supposedly armed and chasing Ahmaud down in their trucks because they believed Ahmaud a trespasser and burglar. On and of someoneelse's property.
Yet, DA Barnhill says of AHMAUD: " (his) prior convictions help explain his apparent aggressive nature and his thought pattern to attack an armed man."
( A conviction for swiping a TV, and years earlier, for simply carrying a gun where that wasn't allowed.)
And Barnhill said this about about stand your ground
-with or without a straight face, either possibility is remarkable:
"Once confronted with a deadly force situation, an individual is entitled to defend himself. An individual isn't required to back away or to submit to an attack."
Referring to Junior's "rights" in that confrontation,
not Ahmaud's.