snowpea666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2020
- Messages
- 489
- Reaction score
- 1,762
MT sais CB arrived in Spain after MM went missing with the winnebago
MT sais CB arrived in Spain after MM went missing with the winnebago
Oh did you ? how miss I miss thatI watched it sometimes ago and I thought I found CB, I posted it here but I am not sure it was really him
No major new revelations from the ITV documentary tonight but there were a few interesting things I picked up on that elaborated on previous bits we've heard about. The main things I took from it were:
- HCW stated the 2013 call following the XY programme appeal contained "concrete" (yes, that word again) evidence about CB's involvement but not enough to start a full investigation.
- There were several people who heard CB's bar confession about MM in 2017. One person who overheard it was the one who initially reported it to LE.
- The rape prosecution of the 72yr old victim in 2018 was as a direct result of the MM investigation German LE instigated in 2017. In the process of interviewing CB's associates in relation to MM, some mentioned a video they had witnessed of the 72-year-old.
- In the process of their investigation, German LE discovered a phone number CB was known to have used in 2007. They then cross-checked the data dump from the PDL mast and found a match.
Nothing new in the doc.Nothing regarding nf,nothing on vehicles..no new pics..what was the point in this?,only reason would be if there was going to be a breakthrough and that isn't sounding likely by the tone of this
That's the impression I got too.Anyone else getting the impression from the documentary that they really don’t have any “concrete” evidence at all? I know we’ve long speculated they’re holding something back - I’m not so sure now.
What were you expecting lol? If the itv media were privy to anything substantial we’d of heard it already by now. It would of been front page news not reserved for a nighttime tv show. It’s probably more aimed at people who aren’t super sleuths like us and haven’t followed every detail every day for the past 2 months lol.Nothing new in the doc.Nothing regarding nf,nothing on vehicles..no new pics..what was the point in this?,only reason would be if there was going to be a breakthrough and that isn't sounding likely by the tone of this
Exactlyyyyy!The point of it is that the rest of the UK aren't on websleuths, so they need to catch up!
I watched it sometimes ago and I thought I found CB, I posted it here but I am not sure it was really him
0:46 0:47 dark glasses
But looks like him in that dark glasses photoThe point is to keep a low profile, c
No, I don't think so.
The guy here is around 5'6 - 5'8 tops, so too short. CB is 6'
Also not CB's style - he didn't dress like a hippy, or like a raver, so not him imo.
I get the feeling the bar and park incidents might have been influenced by drink and drugs.Personally, I think CB has been playing cat & mouse with the police and is enjoying the chase/notoriety status he is receiving. Hiding under a slide in a park with the parents present, saying aloud in a bar what he had done for everybody to hear, retaining the evidence at a factory. He ain't ashamed of what he is nor what he has done.
If they can’t get him for this surely he’s going to sue for millions they have outed him to the whole world......
I thought main aim was to get people to come forward with any evidence that places CB in PDL on 3 May. It only takes one person, maybe a photo where he’s in background for example. Sounded to me like if they can place him there then they can go for prosecutionWhat were you expecting lol? If the itv media were privy to anything substantial we’d of heard it already by now. It would of been front page news not reserved for a nighttime tv show. It’s probably more aimed at people who aren’t super sleuths like us and haven’t followed every detail every day for the past 2 months lol.
That’s what I thought too! It sounds like they literally need to place that phone in his hand and then they can charge him or initiate an arrest warrant.I thought main aim was to get people to come forward with any evidence that places CB in PDL on 3 May. It only takes one person, maybe a photo where he’s in background for example. Sounded to me like if they can place him there then they can go for prosecution
IMO you would only remember who you spoke to so long ago if either you were involved in what they were suspected of, or you suspected them at the time. So either you don’t come forward because you don’t want to incriminate yourself, or because you don’t want to answer questions about why you haven’t come forward earlier. Either scenario doesn’t look likely someone would come forward, which I think was another message of the programmeThat’s what I thought too! It sounds like they literally need to place that phone in his hand and then they can charge him or initiate an arrest warrant.
Mr Wolters said: "At the moment if we interview the suspect he could say, ‘My girlfriend had my phone that night and I didn’t have it’.
"The person he spoke to could put the phone in his hand [by confirming that it was definitely Brückner to whom he spoke], which would mean he was in the area at the time.
"This is the evidence we want before we issue an arrest warrant and then interview him for the murder. It would help the case against him — but we would also need more evidence."
Police hope one phone call will help solve Madeleine McCann mystery
so is that all they are waiting for until they charge him or not ? Its very confusing ...
Thank you for the clarification. All the below have been named in MSM in relation to the MM case and their initials used throughout these threads. I'm sure there are probably others I've missed. Please remove post if any are deemed not appropriate to be listed.
It is okay to develop a list of initials/names for major case players and other individuals who may have been named in Mainstream Media or by LE in relation to the case.