CuriousQuiet1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
- Messages
- 807
- Reaction score
- 7,782
<modsnip: Referenced post was removed due to no link and copyright violation>
I was starting to wonder if we would hear anything new about this case. The gun is interesting. An informant must have given them the location otherwise there would be no reason to link it to HGs murder. I wonder what use it will be in court? They can't match the gun to any ballistics that we know about. Can't say it was a murder weapon if there is no autopsy because there is no body to autopsy. I guess it is part of the circumstantial evidence, if LE can prove that was Bradford's gun it looks bad for him. Also I guess it corroborates the informant's story so a judge and jury would be more inclined to believe the informant.
I was starting to wonder if we would hear anything new about this case. The gun is interesting. An informant must have given them the location otherwise there would be no reason to link it to HGs murder. I wonder what use it will be in court? They can't match the gun to any ballistics that we know about. Can't say it was a murder weapon if there is no autopsy because there is no body to autopsy. I guess it is part of the circumstantial evidence, if LE can prove that was Bradford's gun it looks bad for him. Also I guess it corroborates the informant's story so a judge and jury would be more inclined to believe the informant.
Last edited by a moderator: