To be fair, there were similar comments from families of Beverly Allitt's patients, and we know how that turned out. However, there were other stories about Allitt which suggested there might well be some issues with her, while I'm yet to see anything negative about LL, so I remain concerned about this one until we hear the evidence. If it turns out they've got tons of really good evidence, then fine, all's good, but right now we've not seen anything to suggest it. And rightly so; trials should not be conducted via the media before the actual court trial, it's just this particular type of case has a history of mistaken accusations, and actual medical killers are so rare, it's hard for me to believe in it without hearing of any grounds for suspicion.
Equally, I realise the police and CPS must feel there's compelling evidence or she wouldn't have been charged. However if she is innocent, I feel SO bad for her, this has dragged on for over three years now, and even if she's found not guilty, well, "not guilty" does not equal "declared innocent" so it'll follow her forever unless someone else is found guilty, as many people will think "there's no smoke without fire". In a case that so far sounds like little more than chance or slightly poor care overall, in other words there may not be any actual murderer to be found.