Random question . . . isn't this an admission of guilt as far as trying to deceive LE, her parents, TES, the world @ large, etc . . . . . . and attest to her having a reason (ie: motive) to filing false reports/depos/ etc re: the disappearance and whereabouts of her daughter? If no ZTN exists - it was all a lie - then she is directly admitting being the last one to see her daughter (at least alive if not already deceased). Furthermore, she was intentially attempting to "thwart" the investigation of her missing child even some 31 days later. Who does that? What would be the "reasonable explain-ation" of doing that? How on earth does this help her defense? Admitting this lie, only leads one to wonder why any mother would lie about their daughter's disappearance/death. Is she covering up for something worse by crying "kidnapping by ZTN"? What could be worse except she is directly resonsible for the disappearance and death of her child. Since there was no other adult in charge of this child - at a minimum it is willful neglect of the welfare of her child, if not abuse of a child to homicide of a child and resulting coverup.
