Did he ever way "Caylee" in this part of the interview?
ETA: say Caylee, not way Caylee. yeesh.
2011.07.11 HLN & FOX News Coverage - Caylee Anthony
- Thread starter SoSueMe
- Start date
- Status
Did he ever way "Caylee" in this part of the interview?
ETA: say Caylee, not way Caylee. yeesh.
Boots-OK
Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 0
Oh, Doc....Completely agree with you. I don't get a good feeling about this guy at all. I would just about bet he bulldozed right over those who didn't agree with him. moo
did it ever occur to these people that.
GA was not charged with anything. the police would have been all over him as oppsed to Casey if evidence pointed that way
that GA was NOT ON TRIAL. this trial was about CASEYS culpability and no one elses
that Casey sat in prision for 3 years and faced hte DP and never once told a story other than Zannie
that she is not ""sincere"
that the DTs experts only viewed pictures of the evidence while the states viewed the actual evidence
that the DT said Caylee drowned and her mother refused to call for assistance. the very DEFINATION OF CHILD ABUSE/NEGLECT OR MANSLAUGHTER
someone needs to speak up now that we know how the jury reached their decision. it was unethical to say the least. i am more angry at the jurors than anyone. even the DT. anyone with a brain cell could see this was a sham defense from a KNOWN LIAR. this in unjust a million times over. <modsnip>
GA was not charged with anything. the police would have been all over him as oppsed to Casey if evidence pointed that way
that GA was NOT ON TRIAL. this trial was about CASEYS culpability and no one elses
that Casey sat in prision for 3 years and faced hte DP and never once told a story other than Zannie
that she is not ""sincere"
that the DTs experts only viewed pictures of the evidence while the states viewed the actual evidence
that the DT said Caylee drowned and her mother refused to call for assistance. the very DEFINATION OF CHILD ABUSE/NEGLECT OR MANSLAUGHTER
someone needs to speak up now that we know how the jury reached their decision. it was unethical to say the least. i am more angry at the jurors than anyone. even the DT. anyone with a brain cell could see this was a sham defense from a KNOWN LIAR. this in unjust a million times over. <modsnip>
cynsational
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2008
- Messages
- 272
- Reaction score
- 579
Notes for a book?
Sustained
Justice for Stacy
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2008
- Messages
- 2,678
- Reaction score
- 6,656
If the verdict had gone as it should, wonder what <modsnip> CM would be saying ... "Well y'all, I just took the case cuz I felt sorry for that fella over yonder (points at JB) - knew she was guilty all along - didn't y'all see my Youtube vid from 2008"
Or love letters to ICA.
Prof
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2009
- Messages
- 3,228
- Reaction score
- 112
In the first part of the interview the Foreman is asked about the opening statements, and he replies "IT was shocking." (singular)
Foreman then elaborates (about the opening statements), that State presentation was "pretty standard." When Defense got up they started throwing out things that they (the jury) did not know, "and it really hit us, we had to let it soak in," had to sit back to see what would come from there.
Foreman then elaborates (about the opening statements), that State presentation was "pretty standard." When Defense got up they started throwing out things that they (the jury) did not know, "and it really hit us, we had to let it soak in," had to sit back to see what would come from there.
You're right. From my own notes:
PT opening - it was very shocking
With what they presented thought it was pretty standard.
Showed pictures that would stay with you for life realized how serious it was
When DT got up they started throwing out things that we did not know.
We had to sit back and let it soak in and see where it went from there.
---------
So the PT's opening was "shocking" and what they presented was "pretty standard". ?????
The DT threw out "things we did not know". ?????
bananarama
Seeking Justice for the little ones without a voic
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 363
- Reaction score
- 0
If he said "it was all speculation" one more time, I was gonna scream! They obviously didn't believe a word the experts were telling them. And I want to know why??????
Great post
I really believe these 12 were watching another trial.
I mean they act like everyone else was watching something
else and they were the only ones at the trial.
I really believe these 12 were watching another trial.
I mean they act like everyone else was watching something
else and they were the only ones at the trial.
SyraKelly
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2010
- Messages
- 4,691
- Reaction score
- 106
Um.....yeah. Good luck with that
LOL-Yeah I guess I spoke to soon on that one huh!!
Strange. Here's a quote from last May from CM describing Casey: very, very likable and very bright."
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/en...ikable-and-very-bright-cheney-mason-says.html
cyberborg
Seeking Justice for Victims
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 5,256
- Reaction score
- -3
In Los Angeles I would have reasonable doubt, it could mean my sprinklers were just on ... J/k. Need some relief.
bananarama
Seeking Justice for the little ones without a voic
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 363
- Reaction score
- 0
...and the fact that they used the opening statements as evidence shows they did not listen to a bit of HHJP's instructions!
sbm
This has always bugged me cos the TRUTH is nobody knows if that door was already left like that or not when this pix of her at the door was taken..IOW! That's def not PROOF Caylee had opened the door that far or had opened it at all..Guess it's OK just to *advertiser censored*-ume she did! :maddening:
Nenato5
New Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2011
- Messages
- 210
- Reaction score
- -12
Looks like presser tomorrow will be interesting......quite a lineup!!
Preview..First vote (hand raise) was 12-2..12 innocent & 2 guilty..His words!! What happened to his "not guilty" vs "innocent" stance?
A slip of the tongue is my guess=<modsnip>imho
eta..I really screwed up what he said (fixed it) when I first posted it cos my brain was & still is about to EXPLODE! NG said the "foreman" said he wanted to "cry" when he had to write his verdict down..Puleeze! Is there another 'foreman' we don't know about by any chance?
A slip of the tongue is my guess=<modsnip>imho
eta..I really screwed up what he said (fixed it) when I first posted it cos my brain was & still is about to EXPLODE! NG said the "foreman" said he wanted to "cry" when he had to write his verdict down..Puleeze! Is there another 'foreman' we don't know about by any chance?
- Status