Canada - Laura Babcock, 23, Toronto, 26 June 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
- Most shocking was the fact that Det Carbone was completely unaware of the infamous soft-*advertiser censored* photo shoots that DM arranged inside the Millard hangar. This information has been in the public domain for weeks now. Everyone on this website knows about the photo shoots and yet the lead investigator into LB's disappearance was completely dumbstruck when asked about these photo's? With his response Det Carbone demonstrated that he is completely unfit for the job of a police inspector. Unfortunately cops can never be fired . I suspect this guy will probably get a big promotion.

-Det Carbone was unable to comment on or was unsure about most of the facts of this case but he was certain of two thing. 1) Dellen Millard "was not in the sex trade" (despite evidence to the contrary, e.g. soft-*advertiser censored* photo-shoot) AND 2) Carbone was sure that Laura's was in the "sex trade" although no evidence of this has been presented and it is yet to be proven.
<rsbm>

While they aren't Anne of Green Gables, I'm not sure the photo shoots would classify as soft-*advertiser censored*:

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_porn"]Softcore *advertiser censored* - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

Typically when we discuss "sex trade workers", it is sex being exchanged for money.

JMO
 
IMO this was an absolutely disgraceful performance by Toronto Police. For detective Carbone to come out and describe the investigation as "thorough" is an insult to Laura's family and friends and an insult to our intelligence.

I wholeheartedly agree. I also think that the mention of LB being involved in the "sex trade" is some pathetic justification for the TPS' lack of attention to her case. A "sex trade worker" suggests a member of a lower socio-economic caste --- one apparently not as worthy of police investigation as a middle class woman.

Overall, I am quite disgusted by today's "TPS CYA" presser.
 
The detective said that DM & LB had a "romantic relationship" but not a "traditional dating relationship", whatever that means. Since he has interviewed neither DM or LB, he really doesn't know what their relationship was, why would he repeat hearsay in a press conference, and not in the stilted policespeak they usually use. More questions than answers after this press conference

Was that said in the presser? Do you have a link for those statements?

Tya
 
They didn't even say things like We have received x number of tips, conducted x number of interviews and have opened lines of enquiry. They didn't ask for tips from the public. They didn't show any pics during the presser, just distributed one after. Didn't distribute pics of her distinctive jewellery. Being surprised at the soft *advertiser censored* thing tells me that haven't even searched for LB on FB , twitter or google. I find SL more credible than the police that they DID have the phone records. So what we saw was blah, blah, blah thorough investigation, blah blah thorough investigation, blah blah, sex trade worker. Not one member of the media there learned a single thing that was new except maybe the escort thing. If she worked from the internet, why didn't they show a headshot from her website? This was just a big exercise in CYA. LB is very loved by many friends, and they are no further ahead. I wish them luck, they're going to need it.
 
So it appears that DM was the second man in LBs life. I'm thinking she was cheating on her bf with DM.
 
Hey!

I Googled LB for images and after pages and pages its probably unrelated but man does this guy look like DM. Funny He has the same last name as LB.

I don't think I am allowed to post the link. He is supposedly in Van, BC.
 
I'm glad to see some of the same outrage here that I feel with TPS 'investigating' LB's disappearance.

My biggest outrage is towards Carbone prefacing what passes for a TPS press conference with 'LB was involved in the sex trade.' Who cares? What does that mean regarding LB's disappearance? If TPS finds it necessary to announce a missing persons lifestyle then show the relevance - or stay quiet.

Utter nonsense, imo.

Have never posted this term before but feel the need now - WTF? Who are you guys? - I notice there are rarely any female TPS officers involved where it would be helpful and make a positive difference.

It's the same attitude, imo, that Vancouver Police and the RCMP had before 'discovering' Picton was kidnapping and murdering many, many woman from Vancouver. I'm not saying DM is the same caliber as Picton, but TPS learned nothing from that experience including an expensive inquiry. What a waste. Who decides when LE looks for a missing person and when they don't? I would like to see that in writing - not hear it from TPS.

My only consolation was how uncomfortable Carbone was - tripping over and repeating his words. Imo, he felt the pressure to be 'taking one for the team.'

And - TPS taking credit for any info in today's presser is shameful - we have heard or discovered everything here already - without TPS involvement. The search by TPS at DM's farm is just as I expected it would be - a sham to look like they were 'on it.' They had no leads, no info to search and wasted taxpayers money to put on a show for the public. Some will buy it, some won't.
 
they obviously have some evidence that suggests she was a sex trade worker, which also explains why her family was not so forth coming with information about her.. I would imagine being in that lifestyle alone would bring danger to herself at the end of the conference he says there were many supplementary reports added to the original occurance
 
The detective said that DM & LB had a "romantic relationship" but not a "traditional dating relationship", whatever that means. Since he has interviewed neither DM or LB, he really doesn't know what their relationship was, why would he repeat hearsay in a press conference, and not in the stilted policespeak they usually use. More questions than answers after this press conference

hmmm so was DM a paying customer of LB's? Perhaps he didn't pay up, might explain all those phone calls to him.
 
I don't believe that this screenshot shows her number but it does seem to show his:

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=34525&d=1370022410

Hmm, this has probably been posted but a google search of the last number called, brought me to an image of this page, from Feb 10, 2012 (this is google cache version, so the number is highlighted).

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...012.pdf+647-892-3355&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca

*I now see that hdmi posted the link above on may 17*
 
they obviously have some evidence that suggests she was a sex trade worker, which also explains why her family was not so forth coming with information about her.. I would imagine being in that lifestyle alone would bring danger to herself at the end of the conference he says there were many supplementary reports added to the original occurance

Who cares what LB did for a living? - she's missing. I would not believe any supplementary report added by TPS to this file - funny enough I asked the question a number of pages back - what will TPS add to file and can it be believed?

All any of this nonsense will do, imo, is eventually undermine the Hamilton Police trial against DM.
 
hmmm so was DM a paying customer of LB's? Perhaps he didn't pay up, might explain all those phone calls to him.

Nope, he was emphatic that DM was not involved in the sex trade, and seemed completely taken aback when asked about the soft *advertiser censored*, looked like he was hearing it for the first time
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
3,924
Total visitors
4,051

Forum statistics

Threads
594,239
Messages
18,000,773
Members
229,344
Latest member
tvfire1018
Back
Top