No, Amanda only testified that she found the door open.
The pro guilt logic is that Amanda found the door open, therefore she went prancing around the cottage naked without bothering to close the door.
I have no clue why anyone would think that way. But perhaps they are so full of hate that they have stopped thinking.
Bouncing off of Otto's reply.....and what about the argument that she did some of these odd things because of her "quirkiness?" She could have indeed left the door open and gone and taken a shower and pranced around the house naked due to her "quirkiness" and kind of in some of haze she was supposedly in during her "childhood."
But oh I see, so she can be quirky when it suits someone's argument, but not quirky when it doesn't suit it.