suzyjackson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2012
- Messages
- 2,501
- Reaction score
- 3,644
I agree suzyjackson, particularly with your point the car may have been somewhere it shouldn't have. That's been my theory all along. Once the LE establish its KR's car, wherever that may be, they will have some sort of a route the car took.
Obviously LE have sightings or CCTV, or both, of the car but I'm getting the impression they are crossing their t's and dotting their i's with the final stages of the investigation.
If your building a case against BR and hes told you i drove up highway and turned around on highway but you have footage showing him driving past a country town on the way to a very large forest and he has forgotten to tell you that, the it brings him into further suspicion and if you find her body it places him very close to the scene and further proves he is lying about his movements that day. If the wanted to quickly eliminate all owners of the cars they could have made an appeal...i think this is just a reminder to BR that rhey are slowly building a case. The weekly drip feeding must be awful for the man that dumped her so callously. I'd imagine the picture of her deceased face would be haunting at night and the police a slowly circling. Its only a matter of when not if I hope.
Absolutely makes sense; unfortunately assumptions, logic and even common bloody sense don't stand up in Court. His Defence could say 'there are 132 others of that model in Victoria alone, what's your proof that it was our client??'
They can assume during the investigation but when taking it to Court, the i's have to be dotted and the t's crossed to get a conviction, especially when relying on circumstantial evidence.
Eg: 'it couldn't have been anyone else but your client as we've ruled out all other possibilities'
Thanks guys, I do understand about building a case for court in the future but unless these car sightings actually lead them to a body there isn't going to be a court care IMO.
If the police know where Karen's body is why aren't they out searching or asking the public for help. Just to play devil's advocate, BR may be lying about where he went in the car but that doesn't prove anything, he could have a secret mistress, he might be scoring drugs, he might be committing other crimes or he may have other secrets he's trying to keep . I'd really like to know more about what the police are thinking.
Another thing I'm wondering is whether BR took his phone with him on other journeys in the car, if he wasn't smart enough to turn it off on the Calder Hwy then maybe it might be possible to link his phone pings with the places where Karen's car has been spotted.