I agree. I can ignore a lot of it. There’s still great information. It raises a lot of questions and good points to consider.Undisclosed has zero objectivity.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. I can ignore a lot of it. There’s still great information. It raises a lot of questions and good points to consider.Undisclosed has zero objectivity.
This is because he is guilty. The HBO doc’s executive producer is Rabia, so that should give you an indication of the bias behind the “documentary.” It is just another pro-innocence production, much like Making a Murderer, The Staircase and the recent Scott Peterson piece.I've been watching the HBO series on Adnan's case. It seems like they are trying to make a case for his innocence or at least reasonable doubt, but in my opinion, it makes an even stronger case for his guilt than Serial did.
I think he's guilty and justice has been served. I see that he lost his recent bid for a new trial as well.
So he’s no solid alibi then? They seem to leave that part out a lot, they go on and on about Don not having a solid alibi but conveniently they don’t highlight the fact Adnan doesn’t have one either... hmmm..He said he was fixing his car with Dion in the school parking lot. Then he changed it to say he wasn’t doing that, instead he was at the school and went to track and then to the mosque. Not one person from the mosque stepped forward to say they had seen him that evening/night, even though this was one of the most popular nights in the Muslim faith to be at the mosque.
Yip, total bias, the fact Amy Berg is involved as well says it all.. need I mention West of Memphis. She’s seems to have a habit of trying to free guilty people!This is because he is guilty. The HBO doc’s executive producer is Rabia, so that should give you an indication of the bias behind the “documentary.” It is just another pro-innocence production, much like Making a Murderer, The Staircase and the recent Scott Peterson piece.
So he’s no solid alibi then? They seem to leave that part out a lot, they go on and on about Don not having a solid alibi but conveniently they don’t highlight the fact Adnan doesn’t have one either... hmmm..
But how long was he in the library for? My point is where was he from the whole time school let out until midnight that night, he wasn’t in the library the whole time, who else saw him in that time frame, where did he go after the library if he was in fact there?? there was talk of sports practice and fixing his car, I believe that was 2 stories he told. Asia said she had a 20 min convo with him in the library, let’s say that’s true.. can the exact time be corroborated? Could she have been off by some time or by days? If not, where was he the rest of the afternoon and evening? Did anyone else see him?Wasn't that one of the points for the re-trial though? There was a girl who said she saw him in the library in the afternoon. She wasn't called by Adnan's defence as a potential alibi for him but if she is telling the truth, then he would have had an alibi
'Serial' Witness Asia McClain on the Last Time She Saw Adnan Syed
Go to reddit and look up serialpodcastorigins - a bunch of us paid for the police file and made it available to everyone.I'm horrible, just realized I was spelling his name wrong . Disregard my post.