Curious, what facts are incorrect and/or refuted?
It's clear that some are ready to accept suicide as the cause.
However, the Medical Examiner / Coroner has not made an official determination. Finding the truth is not about suppressing theories or facts. It would be a lot better if some report makes you uncomfortable, that you logically and factually prove it false. We don't come here to disrespect the fallen or their families. I'm here to get to the truth.
The article’s main claim is that her body couldn’t have been in the water for the entire time of her disappearance—because it would have been found sooner. I believe that argument shows lack of knowledge of what happens with drowning victims. (They sink, and rise to the surface after several days. Salt water is more buoyant than fresh water, but not enough for a drowning victim to float immediately.) They had dive teams searching—but that sort of search isn’t infallible. I bet the dive teams would be the first to agree.
The paragraph about the friend who visited her makes some nasty insinuations, but doesn’t really have anything to be refuted. It’s heartbreakingly common for friends and family of a suicide victim to only realize afterwards that someone was acting strangely.
Obviously, that there’s some crime in the area is a fact that doesn’t need to be refuted. There’s some crime everywhere in the country.
The article says that she was making long-term plans. Well, suicide isn’t a logical action, and depression can fluctuate.
I can’t see how it’s relevant that her backpack was found on the beach. Actually, it makes foul play seem less likely, I’d think. (The crime-in-the-area type of random attack isn’t going to stage a suicide.)
So, as I see it, the only fact in the article that’s an issue is the camera that captured her leaving the beach, but did not capture her return. An explanation for that was offered up-thread. I don’t know enough about camera lighting needs, and the lighting situation at the time—it would have been the middle of the night—to know whether that’s a valid explanation. (Note that if the camera is reliable 24 hours a day, in all weather conditions, and foul play was involved, her body still had to be put in the ocean somewhere, and then drift to the place she visited last.)
Is there any possibility of it being an accident? Swimming alone in the middle of the night would be a very dangerous, and cold, thing to do, but people have done stranger things. (Or walking in the surf—earlier in the thread slippery rocks were mentioned.)
All the above is my opinion only.