10ofRods
Verified Anthropologist
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2019
- Messages
- 15,406
- Reaction score
- 192,273
Exactly. There must be evidence of all those methods (blunt force, firearm, stabbing) and probably they do not know what was the COD.
I assume he was found with evidence of abuse (probably the blunt force trauma / knife or sharp object - there was the blood in the house) when she snapped and injured him. And then, she killed him to hide the abuse probably using a firearm. (does she have a firearm registered?? or Al? I am sure LE would have looked into registered weapons )
Not a lawyer but I assume if there was no evidence of firearm used then there wouldn't be a firearm charge. I assume they did toxicology and that's why there is no mention of poisoning / OD on medicine like some of us thought.
MOO of course
It's possible they immediately knew the CoD if it was gun-related. At least, it would have been "the fatal injury" no matter what else went on.