Yesterday when I read that the father/BF had not even seen her, I thought, My God, not even a brief supervised type of visitation?
At the time, I had read that the father/BF said they had not even taken his DNA, only Savanna's.
But above, not even a photo.
Yes, harsh, quite harsh to say the least given the tragic circumstances. Put A Rush On It!
I think it has to do with the parents being unmarried and mother being dead, baby not born in hospital and therefore, father not formally ID'd by the mother via paperwork:
<snip> Cass County Social Services President, Chip Ammerman, said children need to be with relatives when its appropriate and thats best. That theyre capable of caring for a child and meeting the childs basic needs. So thats going to be our primary focus.
Once DNA testing is complete, Cass County Social Services will set up a meeting with the family to discuss how to proceed.
http://www.valleynewslive.com/conte...g-to-see-infant-found-Thursday-441794613.html
<snip & BBM>
Police didn't collect DNA evidence from Matheny right away, perhaps because the couple is not married.
On Friday morning, Fargo Police asked Matheny to come in so they could collect DNA evidence from him. They took three cotton swabs worth of DNA from the inside of his mouth. Matheny was told results would take about a week to produce.
http://www.grandforksherald.com/new...y-world-me-says-boyfriend-missing-fargo-woman