With JB's "nothings wrong" type of behavior questions with EVERY witness so far....right AFTER the SA did the same line of questioning, the jury's gonna find it REALLY hard to believe it was a "psychological" problem as opposed to the real reason - she just DIDN'T care and just being the "typical KC" party girl.
IMO, the defense is banking on one of the psych doctors explainations that she was just suffering from PTSD and "blocking it out"....after all these witnesses said the same things about her behavior being "normal"....I DO NOT think the jury's gonna go "ah ha!!!!".....they're gonna say "ah nah"....
I'm guessing the defense will eventually have a psychologist on who will say that some people who live through trauma can act like nothing happened as a way of dealing with it.
Yes but his father or mother advised him not to take the call and he didn't.Isn't Chris the one ICA tried calling from jail. He also brought Caylee's bathing suit to the A's.
So was she "seeing" this guy while she was with Tony?
Caylee & ICA spent the night with yet another guy.... we're up to what 4 now in a few months time? That have testified so far... more coming.
So that's what the kids are calling it these days. "Free association" is what it look like to me.
Now to shut up so I don't get a TO.
George is confusing me with the dates. When did seeing her in a different car occur according to CS?Me too...I thought it was only Casey...and that it was during the time Caylee was missing.
I must be confused....unless she went over to his house to sleep more than once.
So was she "seeing" this guy while she was with Tony?
I wanted to say in the morning thread - I am surprised at the posters who are harping on the jury for asking for things....really? I would be asking for the moon at this point.
Give them the darn hockey game and pretzels...
So was she "seeing" this guy while she was with Tony?
Do you think JB will ask Dante about posting here at Websleuths??????
They're not allowed to do that in the guilt phase because they refused the State access to Casey to do their own evaluation. They have no evidence to present to the jury about any psychological issues Casey may have been having. Only their word... which is not evidence!