I disagree. Duct tape across a child's mouth and nose along with the mother hiding the child's body in the woods, hiding out and lying for 31 days about where the child is, partying like there's no tomorrow and falsely accusing an imaginary person of kidnapping the child are all evidence of murder by the mother.
There is no evidence that Caylee drowned and there was no testimony presented to show that she drowned. Baez's statement should not have been considered by the jury and if any of the jurors did consider it, they violated the rules. Putting that aside, consider Dr. G's testimony that 100% of times when a child drowns, 911 is called. No one hides a child's body to cover up an accident. No one covers up an accident by making it look like murder. It's simple common sense.
It was, IMO, proven that the stain in the trunk was decomp. The chemical in the stain were 'consistent' with decomp which, in science, is as definite as you get. It's like with paternity tests when the results show 99.9% that someone is the father. Nothing is ever 100%.
Seriously, what are the chances that a stain consistent with decomposition would somehow appear in the trunk of a woman's car at the same time that her child goes missing and is later found dead in the woods and that it would be an innocent coincidence. How would a person accidentally create a stain with chemicals consistent with human decomp?