Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Replay available with captioning. Starts at about 14:39
I don't think he's bowlegged. I think he is wearing his pants low, so is forced to walk that way to keep them up.He also looks like he is bow-legged.
IF it is then he changed clothes. Doesn’t look like same clothes from shell video.So POI seems pretty confirmed from evidence and what LE said. I really don’t think they have the wrong guy
The video was recovered from a surveillance camera within the Tom Brown Housing complex at about the same time as Kamille Mckinney was reported missing.
No, it does not apply to an active missing child. This has always been Websleuth's policy.
I believe he said dogs today, rain tomorrow, public search SundayOk, thanks. I missed that part. I didn't see the end either because the video froze but they were saying something about bringing the dogs there and it might rain or something?
When did they say they would use the dogs? I guess they want to see where her scent stopped to verify that she was picked up there?
Or just to see where else she may have gone?
Did anyone notice if her shoes were still on her feet when they ran after the man? It's a good thing they have her shoes for the search dogs to use.
Imo
If the POI was the second man in the video who engages the children wouldn’t LE bring him in again?So POI seems pretty confirmed from evidence and what LE said. I really don’t think they have the wrong guy
I don't think it was a playground. It was just one area in the complex. The kids may have been separated from the other kids at the party. Maybe that's why the suspect decided to take her at that point.I thought there was a bunch of kids in the playground. Where are they? It was dark too.
Not what I expected to see at all.
Welcome to WS! This is perplexing IMO. They said they have talked to the suspect - which makes me think they have something other than the video to place him there (cell phone ping/GPS locator?) but seriously, why wouldn't he be arrested then unless he is the same guy released on bond? IDKIf the POI was the second man in the video who engages the children wouldn’t LE bring him in again?
“The two are still persons of interest in the 3-year-old's disappearance because video evidence and witnesses connect them to the vehicle police recovered over the weekend”
2 people questioned in Alabama girl's disappearance charged in unrelated cases
Oh I don't like this at all.Questions for Police Chief
- First question is how difficult is this for your team
- They are looking for the first man in the video. They know who the "second suspect" is. Someone asks for clarity - are they suspects? He says "well, no, we just want to talk to him and want to know if he saw anything." THE SECOND MAN IS A SUSPECT. Video was taken in and around the housing complex.
- Is Kamille one of the children in the video? "We believe that she was"
- How much planning went into this kidnapping? "I think maybe about 20 minutes. I don't believe a lot of planning went into it I think it was something that was done impromptu. I have no idea"
- Why wait til Sunday for search? They are currently using K9s and tomorrow there is rain
- Who is the second child? "We have information and pretty much identified the second child. We are not going to put her name or family out there. We met with several members of that communtiy as well as the child's mother and we certainly don't want to put another 3 year old's name out there"
- "This is the last known location where we can determine where she was"
- Hoping someone will see the video or he himself will identify himself, they have no identifying info to give the public
- Someone asked about motive - they have no motive in mind, they remain open
- Where is security footage from - complex or outside the complex? No real answer, it is just of the area near the complex where children were playing.
- Just to reiterate - confirms they do believe one of the children in the video is Kamille
- Emailing video out to journalists
They may be waiting for evidence. They still don't have the DNA and they need to talk to the other man.If the POI was the second man in the video who engages the children wouldn’t LE bring him in again?
If the POI was the second man in the video who engages the children wouldn’t LE bring him in again?
I need to go listen to the answer again because he said they have spoken with the child's mother - I don't know if he said her mother though.Can ya'll identify the gender of the second child? I'm seeing people on sm state that is a boy, but I cannot tell. If that is so, then that makes me fear child sex trafficking more. I-20, known as Sex Trafficking Superhighway, is within a mile or two of the scene of the abduction.
That makes sense to me. Now I'm more convinced they are the same man.I’m just saying, they most likely had this video evidence, identified suspect #2, and released the pictures of the suspect at the gas station (since the gas station video defiantly was not video evidence of the crime- just pictures/video of him). I’m pretty sure they had this evidence from day 1. They said witness statements and video evidence which makes sense when they released this video. Just my opinion though. I could be wrong.