Angel Who Cares
If you seek an angel with an open heart, you shall
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 22,925
- Reaction score
- 92
*Just found this articles from Dr Lillian Glass!
Baby Gabriel Babysitter’s Body Language Shows No Signals of Deception and Gives Insight To What Possibly Happened to the Baby
Friday, January 22nd, 2010 at 7:34 am
<snipped>
NOTHING WRONG WITH AN 18 YEAR OLD BABYSITTING AT A HOTEL
First of all the babysitter, Analisa Urias is 18, which is legal age in the state of Texas. There is nothing wrong with the babysitter looking on Craigslist to find a babysitting job. There is also nothing wrong with going to a hotel or a motel to babysit, especially if it is in the daytime at 11:45 AM, as the babysitter said. In fact, top hotels often hire outside babysitters to accommodate their guests.
The fact that Elizabeth Johnson even thought to hire a babysitter is a good sign that deep down she wanted the baby alive and she wanted to make sure the baby was OK. She could have very well left the baby alone in the motel room and put a Do Not Disturb sign on the door, but instead, she hired a babysitter.
ANALISA’S BODY LANGUAGE
On every show, she was cooperative, open, forthright, made direct eye contact, spoke directly in a sonorous tone and most important of all showed NO SIGNALS OF DECEPTION. She showed no signals that she had any other agenda than to babysit the child.
The information which she gave to the press was very important.
ELIZABETH’S IMPORTANT MEETING, WEARING A HOT OUTFIT AND RETURNING 2 HOURS LATER
1. Analisa was told by Elizabeth that she was going to a very important meeting. Maybe that important meeting was for paid sex. The fact that she returned two hours later, happy and smiling, says to me that she was happy and satisfied. Maybe her important meeting even supplied her with drugs that put her in a happy mood.
DETACHED FROM THE BABY
2. Analisa said Elizabeth was detached from the baby. This means Elizabeth had other things on her mind, like partying in her hot looking outfit or earning some money, or scoring some drugs.
She was obviously preoccupied. Her room was a mess with everything thrown around which also leads me to believe that she didn’t utilize the maid service as she no doubt didn’t want anyone coming into her room.
Maybe she had something to hide like drugs or the fact that she had a kidnapped baby in her possession.
DID TOO MUCH MEDICATION ACCIDENTLY KILL BABY GABRIEL?
3. The fact that Elizabeth’s room was a mess, the baby seemed not fed and only smiled when he got the bottle which he drank voraciously, obviously meant that Elizabeth was being negligent with the child.
If he wasn’t ill, maybe Elizabeth gave him medication to make him stop crying and to sleep so she wouldn’t be bothered by him. Maybe she gave him too much medicine and accidently killed him.
Maybe that is when she called the baby daddy to tell him what she did. Maybe she was telling the truth and did indeed kill the baby. Maybe in her warped thinking she thought that the baby wouldn’t have died, if Logan didn’t have custody and she wasn’t in this predicament. So in essence her call to him may have been an admission that the child was dead and that it in her mind it was his fault that all of this happened. She would never take responsibility as to what happened, but rather shift the blame that it happened because of Logan, the baby daddy.
WAS SHARP KNIFE INDICATION OF HER PARANOIA AND FEAR OF BEING FOUND OUT?
4. The sharp knife sitting in the room may have been used for her protection. Maybe she was paranoid from all the drugs she may have been taking.
Maybe she thought someone would break into her room in the middle of the night. Maybe she thought the baby daddy would find her and that she would use the knife to ward him off.
WHO ARGUED WITH ELIZABETH OVER THE PHONE? WAS IT TAMMI SMITH?
5. The clue which Analisa revealed that means the most to me is that when she arrived back at the motel two hours later and received a phone call from someone (a woman’s voice) speaking loud enough for Analisa to hear.
Johnson told her it was her grandmother and explained her husband was threatening her family because of a custody battle.
When authorities questioned Elizabeth’s grandmother, she told them that she did not speak to Elizabeth. Sooooooo, I wonder if that screaming and yelling on the other end of the phone was person of interest, Tammi Smith.
Maybe she was yelling at Analisa to not screw up any plans they may have possibly made.
TOO MUCH INFORMATION ABOUT A CAR SEAT AND LEAVING IT BEHIND
6. The hotel staff said that Johnson booked the room for a week so she was there from the 21st of December and the baby was alive on the 26th making it 5 days. She left behind a car seat and clothes, which make me believe that she left in a hurry.
There was no couple and no car seat in my view. The only car seat was the one she left behind that Gabriel could no longer use, because he was not alive to use it.
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS or MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA- WHERE WAS GABRIEL’S BODY DUMPED?
7. After hearing Analisa’s interviews I have a new perspective on the case. I wonder if the baby was given medication to shut him up so Elizabeth didn’t have to deal with him and his crying.
Perhaps she gave him too much medication and Baby Gabriel never woke up.
Perhaps she disposed of his little body in San Antonio. She may have even also put Baby Gabriel’s body in a bag or suitcase and taken it on the bus with her to Miami Beach where she may have gotten rid of him in the vast ocean.
WAS TAMMI SMITH PLANNING TO HAVE ELIZABETH DROP GABRIEL WITH ONE OF HER OTHER RELATIVES FOR SAFE KEEPING UNTIL HIS LOOKS CHANGED ?
Maybe it wasn’t Elizabeth’s intention to kill Baby Gabriel. Maybe it was her intention to give him to someone for safe keeping until he got older and his looks changed.
The fact that Tammi Smith brought this up after visiting Elizabeth in the jail, concerns me. Since she already tried to concoct something with her first cousin Craig Cherry being the father of baby Gabriel when he in fact never even met Elizabeth, anything is possible.
Perhaps there was a relative of Tammi’s in San Antonio who agreed to do this. The fact that Tammi nonchalantly in her monotone loud confident voice told reporters that Elizabeth said the people who have the baby “are going to try to hide the baby” said that his looks will change as he gets older.
Tammi’s statement is cause for concern. This sounds like a concocted story. Why would anyone even think to say this? If Elizabeth gave the baby to someone they wouldn’t say that they were going to hide the baby until his looks changed. That is preposterous!
Also who in their right mind would want to knowingly get involved in any illegal action with a baby and ruin their lives and freedom and face kidnaping charges down the road?
Also the fact that Tammi mentioned to the press that Elizabeth said that she and the couple to whom she gave the baby” signed papers but it was not notarized,” is also a signal of deception to me. It is way too much information.
Who talks about notarizing papers when they are giving away a baby and when they have lost custody of the baby and have kidnapped the baby and are on the run? It is ridiculous!
THE GRIM REALITY OF WHAT PROBABLY HAPPENED TO BABY GABRIEL
The fact that Elizabeth is uncooperative and won’t meet with a sketch artist to recreate the physical characteristics of the “alleged” couple to whom she gave Baby Gabriel leads me to believe the poor baby is dead and has died at her hands, most likely through an overdose of medication
I am not the only one who thinks this way. Criminal Profiler Pat Brown seems to think that Baby Gabriel is dead as well. I hope we are both wrong, s.unfortunately I believe we are both right in our thoughts.
Article:
http://drlillianglassbodylanguagebl...ight-a-to-what-probably-happened-to-the-baby/
Baby Gabriel Babysitter’s Body Language Shows No Signals of Deception and Gives Insight To What Possibly Happened to the Baby
Friday, January 22nd, 2010 at 7:34 am
<snipped>
NOTHING WRONG WITH AN 18 YEAR OLD BABYSITTING AT A HOTEL
First of all the babysitter, Analisa Urias is 18, which is legal age in the state of Texas. There is nothing wrong with the babysitter looking on Craigslist to find a babysitting job. There is also nothing wrong with going to a hotel or a motel to babysit, especially if it is in the daytime at 11:45 AM, as the babysitter said. In fact, top hotels often hire outside babysitters to accommodate their guests.
The fact that Elizabeth Johnson even thought to hire a babysitter is a good sign that deep down she wanted the baby alive and she wanted to make sure the baby was OK. She could have very well left the baby alone in the motel room and put a Do Not Disturb sign on the door, but instead, she hired a babysitter.
ANALISA’S BODY LANGUAGE
On every show, she was cooperative, open, forthright, made direct eye contact, spoke directly in a sonorous tone and most important of all showed NO SIGNALS OF DECEPTION. She showed no signals that she had any other agenda than to babysit the child.
The information which she gave to the press was very important.
ELIZABETH’S IMPORTANT MEETING, WEARING A HOT OUTFIT AND RETURNING 2 HOURS LATER
1. Analisa was told by Elizabeth that she was going to a very important meeting. Maybe that important meeting was for paid sex. The fact that she returned two hours later, happy and smiling, says to me that she was happy and satisfied. Maybe her important meeting even supplied her with drugs that put her in a happy mood.
DETACHED FROM THE BABY
2. Analisa said Elizabeth was detached from the baby. This means Elizabeth had other things on her mind, like partying in her hot looking outfit or earning some money, or scoring some drugs.
She was obviously preoccupied. Her room was a mess with everything thrown around which also leads me to believe that she didn’t utilize the maid service as she no doubt didn’t want anyone coming into her room.
Maybe she had something to hide like drugs or the fact that she had a kidnapped baby in her possession.
DID TOO MUCH MEDICATION ACCIDENTLY KILL BABY GABRIEL?
3. The fact that Elizabeth’s room was a mess, the baby seemed not fed and only smiled when he got the bottle which he drank voraciously, obviously meant that Elizabeth was being negligent with the child.
If he wasn’t ill, maybe Elizabeth gave him medication to make him stop crying and to sleep so she wouldn’t be bothered by him. Maybe she gave him too much medicine and accidently killed him.
Maybe that is when she called the baby daddy to tell him what she did. Maybe she was telling the truth and did indeed kill the baby. Maybe in her warped thinking she thought that the baby wouldn’t have died, if Logan didn’t have custody and she wasn’t in this predicament. So in essence her call to him may have been an admission that the child was dead and that it in her mind it was his fault that all of this happened. She would never take responsibility as to what happened, but rather shift the blame that it happened because of Logan, the baby daddy.
WAS SHARP KNIFE INDICATION OF HER PARANOIA AND FEAR OF BEING FOUND OUT?
4. The sharp knife sitting in the room may have been used for her protection. Maybe she was paranoid from all the drugs she may have been taking.
Maybe she thought someone would break into her room in the middle of the night. Maybe she thought the baby daddy would find her and that she would use the knife to ward him off.
WHO ARGUED WITH ELIZABETH OVER THE PHONE? WAS IT TAMMI SMITH?
5. The clue which Analisa revealed that means the most to me is that when she arrived back at the motel two hours later and received a phone call from someone (a woman’s voice) speaking loud enough for Analisa to hear.
Johnson told her it was her grandmother and explained her husband was threatening her family because of a custody battle.
When authorities questioned Elizabeth’s grandmother, she told them that she did not speak to Elizabeth. Sooooooo, I wonder if that screaming and yelling on the other end of the phone was person of interest, Tammi Smith.
Maybe she was yelling at Analisa to not screw up any plans they may have possibly made.
TOO MUCH INFORMATION ABOUT A CAR SEAT AND LEAVING IT BEHIND
6. The hotel staff said that Johnson booked the room for a week so she was there from the 21st of December and the baby was alive on the 26th making it 5 days. She left behind a car seat and clothes, which make me believe that she left in a hurry.
There was no couple and no car seat in my view. The only car seat was the one she left behind that Gabriel could no longer use, because he was not alive to use it.
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS or MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA- WHERE WAS GABRIEL’S BODY DUMPED?
7. After hearing Analisa’s interviews I have a new perspective on the case. I wonder if the baby was given medication to shut him up so Elizabeth didn’t have to deal with him and his crying.
Perhaps she gave him too much medication and Baby Gabriel never woke up.
Perhaps she disposed of his little body in San Antonio. She may have even also put Baby Gabriel’s body in a bag or suitcase and taken it on the bus with her to Miami Beach where she may have gotten rid of him in the vast ocean.
WAS TAMMI SMITH PLANNING TO HAVE ELIZABETH DROP GABRIEL WITH ONE OF HER OTHER RELATIVES FOR SAFE KEEPING UNTIL HIS LOOKS CHANGED ?
Maybe it wasn’t Elizabeth’s intention to kill Baby Gabriel. Maybe it was her intention to give him to someone for safe keeping until he got older and his looks changed.
The fact that Tammi Smith brought this up after visiting Elizabeth in the jail, concerns me. Since she already tried to concoct something with her first cousin Craig Cherry being the father of baby Gabriel when he in fact never even met Elizabeth, anything is possible.
Perhaps there was a relative of Tammi’s in San Antonio who agreed to do this. The fact that Tammi nonchalantly in her monotone loud confident voice told reporters that Elizabeth said the people who have the baby “are going to try to hide the baby” said that his looks will change as he gets older.
Tammi’s statement is cause for concern. This sounds like a concocted story. Why would anyone even think to say this? If Elizabeth gave the baby to someone they wouldn’t say that they were going to hide the baby until his looks changed. That is preposterous!
Also who in their right mind would want to knowingly get involved in any illegal action with a baby and ruin their lives and freedom and face kidnaping charges down the road?
Also the fact that Tammi mentioned to the press that Elizabeth said that she and the couple to whom she gave the baby” signed papers but it was not notarized,” is also a signal of deception to me. It is way too much information.
Who talks about notarizing papers when they are giving away a baby and when they have lost custody of the baby and have kidnapped the baby and are on the run? It is ridiculous!
THE GRIM REALITY OF WHAT PROBABLY HAPPENED TO BABY GABRIEL
The fact that Elizabeth is uncooperative and won’t meet with a sketch artist to recreate the physical characteristics of the “alleged” couple to whom she gave Baby Gabriel leads me to believe the poor baby is dead and has died at her hands, most likely through an overdose of medication
I am not the only one who thinks this way. Criminal Profiler Pat Brown seems to think that Baby Gabriel is dead as well. I hope we are both wrong, s.unfortunately I believe we are both right in our thoughts.
Article:
http://drlillianglassbodylanguagebl...ight-a-to-what-probably-happened-to-the-baby/