JBowie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2020
- Messages
- 1,785
- Reaction score
- 13,796
which he was glad to do because he's always getting landed with other people's crimes.
Not clear to me who is always getting 'landed' -- Stein or Hutt?
which he was glad to do because he's always getting landed with other people's crimes.
I would like to hear the results of the forensic examination …. If there were any traces of anything ??? Even though it would appear that the examination was a few days after the demise of dear little C …Mr Stein spending many hours at Penrith Police Station where he undertook two police interviews and was forensically examined, the jury was told.
Charlise Mutten was shot in the face at point blank range, murder trial told, as grisly new details are revealed of the 'charming, chatty and affectionate' young girl's last moments
“Schoolgirl Charlise Mutten was shot in the face by a gun held just a foot away from her, a forensic examiner has told the trial of her stepdad accused of her murder.
Forensic pathologist Dr Marna Du Plessis conducted the post mortem on Charlise's body after it was found in the sand-filled barrel with her pink Nike slides.
She said possible 'powder tattooing' marks around the gunshot wound on the girl's face led her to believe 'the end of the muzzle... was about a ruler's length' away.
Despite being in 'an advanced state of decomposition', Dr Du Plessis said Charlise had been 'shot in the right side of her face, with the bullet entering her brain'.
Dr Du Plessis said this was the fatal shot, and that she was still alive when it was fired as another shot to Charlise's back above her left hip would not have killed her.
The victim's autopsy revealed that she had an amount of the anti-psychotic drug Quetiapine, which was the same medication Stein took for his schizophrenia.”
Charlise Mutten shot directly in the face with gun only a foot away
Nine-year-old Charlise Mutten was fatally shot in the face by a gun held about a foot or 30cm from her, a forensic examiner has told the murder trial of her accused former stepfather, Justin Stein.www.dailymail.co.uk
Justin. Never mind.Not clear to me who is always getting 'landed' -- Stein or Hutt?
It's horrible however you slice it but the DM article I just read said that "Examination of the body also found a 5mm x 5mm entry wound to the right cheek where the bullet struck and dislodged a tooth and stuck in the base of the skull." so perhaps not as awful as we'd otherwise imagine.That whole article….. OMG! Her little face must have been blown in half…. Only her left earring in place….. arghhhh the tears just flow for the poor little angel…..
I know what you mean! When I did attend court the other week, I did want to visualise Stein. But he was in a room that had solid walls with a large sliding glass window, which meant he was sitting on the opposite side of the room, exactly facing the jury. The public gallery did not have a view of him. I thought how I was glad I was not on the jury, having to look at him through the trial.Justin. Never mind.
I wish I could read some of these articles without having to look at his face.
I just hope the prosecution have some tangible forensic evidence linking him to the actual murder …. Perhaps they are saving that for later in the trial…. Closer to closing arguments ????Hate posting from the DM but this was the most recent article that popped up when I searched earlier.. It references multiple comments about KM not wanting to send CM back. JS told the neighbour that she wanted the 3 of them to run away together, his mum's friend also mentioned KM not wanting her to go back. Yesterday the other neighbour described the relationship between KM & CM as "exceptional".
I'm not buying that KM had any reason to want CM dead. It sounds to me like she was in the grips of an ongoing addiction but loved her daughter deeply. I also suspect this is why her parents decided to risk letting CM stay in her care for an extended time.
Charlise Mutten shot directly in the face with gun only a foot away
I can’t actually think of much worse for a child.. the agony of being shot in the hip and staring at a gun in your face, and the absolute fear of being shot … with an alleged rifle approx 30cm away, as per the forensics ..…so perhaps not as awful as we'd otherwise imagine.
There are a few more specifics in The Daily Telegraph article about the location of the lower shot … but not the track pants per-say.Doesn't mention any damage to the track pants that were also in the barrel.
There are a few more specifics in The Daily Telegraph article about the location of the lower shot … but not the track pants per-say.
Dr Du Plessis told the jury Charlise was also shot in her left lower buttock, a shot she would have survived.
And also this, about the possible time of ingestion of the medication…
Dr Du Plessis also considered it possible the Quetiapine may have been ingested within six hours of death due to the presence of it in the stomach of the deceased,” she said.
Paywalled for some
Yes …. I knew what you meant, and I was wondering the same …. But so far there are no answers to that question that I have seen …I was trying to work out what Charlise was wearing, and if the track pants were just thrown into the barrel. There was definitely damage to the back of the skirt ... so I imagine that is what she was wearing. If she also had track pants on under the skirt, there is no damage mentioned to them.
imo
Of course, I didn’t mean it in that way at all, it was certainly horrific and would have been a very scary last few moments for her. I only meant to address the (also horrific) visual that her face “must have been blown in half”.I can’t actually think of much worse for a child.. the agony of being shot in the hip and staring at a gun in your face, and the absolute fear of being shot … with an alleged rifle approx 30cm away, as per the forensics ..…
That is pretty horrific for a little girl … IMO
I think you’re right, what we’ve heard of her behaviour does seem at odds with that theory but I think also humans are notoriously complex & addiction only increases that complexity.I just hope the prosecution have some tangible forensic evidence linking him to the actual murder …. Perhaps they are saving that for later in the trial…. Closer to closing arguments ????
JS is pleading guilty to the disposal of Charlise, and the Police seem to have plenty of evidence regarding that matter. Is there any physical evidence yet that says who actually shot the poor child and exactly when?
I have to admit I find the “loving mother scenario” a little incongruent with her actions over that time, that have, so far, been presented to the court….
JMO