Verified Attorney - Australia
- Jan 22, 2015
- Reaction score
Well, I'd be interested to hear a moderator's perspective on this. Not sure how they can gauge whether you hold a majority position or not when verifying you. Do you always take the converse to majority position on all cases? Or are you saying they have done that to lawyers on this specific case?
I wasn't suggesting that my position had anything to do with not being verified.<modsnip>
I take a legal position and look at the evidence objectively. On this forum an objective analysis has been unwelcome in favour of wild, speculative and often nonsensical assumptions. Unfortunately, the lack of balancing posts remaining on the thread has given more weight to the speculation flying in the face of the evidence and has resulted in the spectacular meltdown of several members that we have witnessed tonight.