katydid23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 66,868
- Reaction score
- 227,651
DNA from WT would be expected to be on his mom's clothing. So unless there was evidence of blood or something like that, I don't see any reason for her to take the risk to drive up to that creek area and bury it.There are plenty of reasons people who have committed crimes discard clothing. It contains DNA, from the wearer’s hair, skin, something you’ve been wearing is far from “clean” evidence wise. It could also contain dna from a victim. It could contain foreign material from seating, broken fragments from weapons/tools/anything really.
Who knows what this material contained but inspecting it is very important. Obviously the search was conducted because information came about evidence may be there. It’s also very interesting what pieces they allowed media to photograph and report.
There are not going to be any remaining hair fibres or tiny fragments, if its been out in the elements for 8 years, IMO.
As for what they 'allowed' to be photographed---weren't there cameras there pretty much the entire time? I thought they took pictures and videos of everything that was pulled from the dirt? Of course anything red or looking like it could be SpiderMan themed was highlighted. JMO