In your opinion. Not mine. Imo when I zoomed in all I saw was white. Again mooIf you zoom in there’s no white neckline it’s just his neck.
In your opinion. Not mine. Imo when I zoomed in all I saw was white. Again mooIf you zoom in there’s no white neckline it’s just his neck.
NOTE ALSO: The differences between 1104jpg and 1105jpg .... with regard to the drink bottle next to William's sister / and also the position of the pram in relation to the screen door.![]()
JMO - Note the white neckline in each of these photos;
......... as opposed to NO white neckline in the iconic photo of William:
![]()
I haven’t seen any googled ones that are any different than the ones posted above. Would you mind guiding me to an example of one you’re referring to? TyiaI googled these pics before to get a clearer view. When you can see them individually, the white bits that you can see in these smaller is actually just skin
is there a 2 min difference between the two? To me it appears Williams sister has moved and may have knocked the water bottle over? Also note Williams position has moved in between those two pics as well. In the 1105 pic he is now facing the camera, which has moved positions as well imoNOTE ALSO: The differences between 1104jpg and 1105jpg .... with regard to the drink bottle next to William's sister / and also the position of the pram in relation to the screen door.
I haven’t seen any googled ones that are any different than the ones posted above. Would you mind guiding me to an example of one you’re referring to? Tyia
Maybe it’s just me. I still see a white tee underneath. It very well could be his skin. Doesn’t look like it to me. MooView attachment 346852
This is from this ABC article New photos of William Tyrrell released five years after disappearance
Yes T-dawg420, there is 2 min difference between the two. I trying to find the times for the other 2 photos (1102jpg and 1103jpg), because those times would be relevant ..... in establishing whether the photos may have been downloaded to the camera from another source on that morning of William's disappearance?is there a 2 min difference between the two? To me it appears Williams sister has moved and may have knocked the water bottle over? Also note Williams position has moved in between those two pics as well. In the 1105 pic he is now facing the camera, which has moved positions as well imo
The position of the pram is unchanged. The photographer has moved to the other side of the patio: a change of angle of maybe 70 degrees. See the floorboards.NOTE ALSO: The differences between 1104jpg and 1105jpg .... with regard to the drink bottle next to William's sister / and also the position of the pram in relation to the screen door.
Thank you for pointing that out JLZ.The position of the pram is unchanged. The photographer has moved to the other side of the patio: a change of angle of maybe 70 degrees. See the floorboards.
is there a 2 min difference between the two? To me it appears Williams sister has moved and may have knocked the water bottle over? Also note Williams position has moved in between those two pics as well. In the 1105 pic he is now facing the camera, which has moved positions as well imo
No need to link again the ABC claim that the CC hearing is to do with William's disappearance. A member has asked the relevant journo why they said that ... AFAIK no response has been received.
Sounds like obfuscation to me."It's hard to put into detail what happened because I had to say it so many times to so many people and I know there is so many people who want to know the exact details and those sorts of things but it's just so personal for us...it's just our last time with him and I feel like I want to keep a lot of those really special memories for us personal, they're our family memories and I know people want to know more but I just, I've just got to keep some things private and special it's just as the time goes on with the whole thing it's just really hard now to keep talking about what happened on that morning"
From the Where's William podcast.
![]()
Have all the journos been silenced though? Or is it only some topics?I am that member and, as yet, no response from the ABC.
Given they were charged with lying and intimidation (please remove if not allowed) I'd imagine the FP are very much in the frame. Let's face it, they've ruled out everyone in the street, all the people they threw in as distractions (eg. Spedding) and the biological parents. The cars were a red herring.It would be interesting to know if FM is still a POI. The police do not seem to be in the habit of promptly telling the public when a POI has been cleared, and I think we might have to wait for the Coronial Report to find out.
"Although the foster mother was initially ruled out as a suspect, she became a person of interest for a period of time last year."
![]()
William Tyrrell's foster mother to plead not guilty to misleading crime commission
The 56-year-old is accused of giving false evidence during a hearing into the disappearance of William Tyrrell from his foster grandmother's home in 2014.www.abc.net.au
Yes agree.Sounds like obfuscation to me.
That's interesting. Who brought up dementia? That would be convenient....
I think the Foster GM spoke some truths and their in lies the inconsistency in the story and timeline of events.
Its too convenient to say she has Dementia/Alzheimer's. My mum is similar age and her memory does get affected by stress. So time frames and order of events can get muddled. But in her walk through she certainly had clarity to answer the policewoman's questions I wouldn't necessarily discount her whole testimony.
Have all the journos been silenced though? Or is it only some topics?
People who speak like that are sometimes very manipulative. They know that if they get talking rubbish for long enough, you'll give up and go away. You can't pin them down and they'll talk through wet cement.I've never heard anyone describe events like the FFC. It's very weird, almost like she's reading her diary entries.
Thank you for the links SA.The 5 photos that were released by the Coroner were taken within a 2min 39sec timespan.
9:35:05 (photo 1102)
9:35:19 (photo 1103)
9:35:28 (photo 1104)
9:37:29 (photo 1105)
9:37:44 (the famous pic)
Janet Fife-Yeomans (chief reporter at DT) says that the photo metadata has been confirmed, that the times are accurate, in her article dated 14/4/22. She does not quote a source for this info.
Her comment says ..... "Metadata has confirmed the photograph was indeed taken at that time after questions during the inquest into William’s disappearance that it may have been taken two hours earlier."
Caroline Overington also seems to indicate that the metadata has been confirmed, in her article of 19/11/21.
She says .... "But William was photographed in his now famous Spider-Man suit at 9.37am, meaning he must have still been alive when his foster father left the house, or else he couldn’t have been in that picture."
![]()
Behind the silence lies so much pain, and so many questions
Close to giving up, or giving in.amp.theaustralian.com.au
Yes, where did the idea that FGM had dementia come from? I’ve never been able to find it out.That's interesting. Who brought up dementia? That would be convenient.