krig101
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 3,768
- Reaction score
- 94
Haha I sure do miss hearing his insights!Yes indeed krig - I should have included his name one more time...lol
Haha I sure do miss hearing his insights!Yes indeed krig - I should have included his name one more time...lol
Detectives questioned Spedding’s wife Margaret about where the toy came from and she reportedly told them it was given to her husband by one of the children they cared for.....
( A snippet from 'The National News' June 10th 2015 ).......
I don't think it is MS changing her story about the figurine...I think it's the Newspapers......I don't think anyone has set BS up by planting the figurine in his vehicle, if that was the case MS wouldn't have admitted to knowing about it in his Vehicle.
I saw the photo with the bike pictured. Still seems odd. A child would not be riding a bike with an adult handle without a supervising adult present. Comments on NSW Police page referred to police who door-knocked residents describing the child as 3 years old. It doesn't make sense.
Nope, not if she knew he had it. And she said he had it in the van the day William went missing. It's just creepy to me.
I don't know why everyone is so hell bent on slagging of MS. There is some doubt in a lot of people about BS. But then Imagine the doubt you would want or hear as the wife. Just because it's her husband and just because she has stuck by him does not make her some evil woman. Put yourself in her shoes..... Im not convinced BS is innocent but so much hate is directed at her. Yet everyone also quotes the manipulative behaviours of pedophiles. I feel sorry for her. If BS is involved she would not be the first oblivious wife in history by a long shot.....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't know why everyone is so hell bent on slagging of MS. There is some doubt in a lot of people about BS. But then Imagine the doubt you would want or hear as the wife. Just because it's her husband and just because she has stuck by him does not make her some evil woman. Put yourself in her shoes..... Im not convinced BS is innocent but so much hate is directed at her. Yet everyone also quotes the manipulative behaviours of pedophiles. I feel sorry for her. If BS is involved she would not be the first oblivious wife in history by a long shot.....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She protecting a Pedophile! That's why!!
Detectives questioned Speddings wife Margaret about where the toy came from and she reportedly told them it was given to her husband by one of the children they cared for.....
( A snippet from 'The National News' June 10th 2015 ).......
I don't think it is MS changing her story about the figurine...I think it's the Newspapers......I don't think anyone has set BS up by planting the figurine in his vehicle, if that was the case MS wouldn't have admitted to knowing about it in his Vehicle.
What has this got to do with William's disappearance?
As an aside, my main annoyance ( putting it mildly) is how the sexual assaults of two small children was dealt with back in 1987. With what the police had, by way of medical evidence and the statements of what the children had said to the mother and grandmother, it should have been prosecuted. I guess the main criteria for the DPP to pursue cases is if they can win on the evidence they have. Based on that, they often deny people their day in court, victims and people who are accused of offences. They do not seem to think long term about about how that process is positive for all involved. There may not have been a conviction against the accused but there is a public record and details of what they have been accused of. The defendant has to sit through a greatly uncomfortable experience with the fear that they may go to jail and if they have a genuine defence, that is on the record as well. In this case, back in 1987, I don't think the children should have had to have been witnesses in court for proceedings to go ahead. The DPP should have proceeded with what they had from the adults involved. Then the children's worth in society would have been upheld by the law. MOO
As an aside, my main annoyance ( putting it mildly) is how the sexual assaults of two small children was dealt with back in 1987. With what the police had, by way of medical evidence and the statements of what the children had said to the mother and grandmother, it should have been prosecuted. I guess the main criteria for the DPP to pursue cases is if they can win on the evidence they have. Based on that, they often deny people their day in court, victims and people who are accused of offences. They do not seem to think long term about about how that process is positive for all involved. There may not have been a conviction against the accused but there is a public record and details of what they have been accused of. The defendant has to sit through a greatly uncomfortable experience with the fear that they may go to jail and if they have a genuine defence, that is on the record as well. In this case, back in 1987, I don't think the children should have had to have been witnesses in court for proceedings to go ahead. The DPP should have proceeded with what they had from the adults involved. Then the children's worth in society would have been upheld by the law. MOO
In 1987 I was 19 and fresh out of high school. Whilst I was at school it was common knowledge that several students had 'affairs' with teachers and I know this for a fact (not me). One girl married her teacher. This did not have the stigma then that of course it would (and should) today. I dont remember child sexual assault/paedophilia being something that was openly in the MSM at the time either regarding small children or teenagers. Im not saying it didnt occur of course. Im saying it was 'not talked about'. In the case of rape I can say it was common for women not to press charges because of the trauma involved in following a case through and the difficulty of getting a conviction. Times have changed and for that I am truly grateful but it seems clear to me that it would be very likely that it was hushed up.
This case is full of creepy coincidences from an accused paedophile been due to be at the GM's when William was abducted to BS driving around with a Spiderman figure in his van that fateful day.
I don't know why was it a Spiderman figure why not a SpongeBob SquarePants figure or whatever else the coincidences are so strange that there's gotta be something in it MOO.
My Websleuths is mucking up badly today....anyone else's ?