FlamingoLady
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 29, 2012
- Messages
- 1,720
- Reaction score
- 5,856
I'm confused...a somewhat normal state for me. The Probable Cause wording doesn't help clear up the confusion either. It says that JC reported his wife missing, the 29th, and while investigating the missing person, Deputy M. made contact with the Corwin's neighbor, CL. That was when CL denied knowing much about Erin and that he & his wife knew her only as an acquaintance. Then, he was re-contacted after the friend in TN gave up the text messages. He admitted kissing, but little else. That's when he stated that he did not see EC on the 28th or 29th....that he was hunting in JTNP on the 28th...got home at 1600 hrs.
Then, again on 7/1 Detectives spoke to CL AND his wife.
It seems to me that they first interviewed him on the 29th....and again on the 30th....and again on the 1st, along with NL. Of course, he could have been interviewed twice in the same day....maybe the 29th or maybe the 30th.
Is that clear as mud?
Yep, it's clear as mud...and I get exactly what you are saying! I have no answer for you. It certainly sounds like LE spoke with CL on the 29th. I wonder why the talk about CL needing an alibi for the 29th, which was stated in another court document (Probable Cause, I think)?