J. J. in Phila
Verified Insider
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 8,450
- Reaction score
- 3,795
Sniped for brevity only.
This exactly. The fact that they found female DNA on her body indicates that she had contact with some unknown woman. The fact that they found male DNA only indicates that the clothing had contact with a male. Sweats are unisex, so these could been worn by some male not even directly involved with the kidnapping.
Notice that I said it was my opinion.
Right. That's what I'm saying. Just because investigators didn't find any female DNA on the clothing doesn't mean there were no Hispanic women involved in the abduction and just because Sherri didn't describe any men doesn't mean there weren't any. One of the women may have been transgender for all we know.
This exactly. The fact that they found female DNA on her body indicates that she had contact with some unknown woman. The fact that they found male DNA only indicates that the clothing had contact with a male. Sweats are unisex, so these could been worn by some male not even directly involved with the kidnapping.