No_Stone_Unturned
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2011
- Messages
- 4,016
- Reaction score
- 3,472
Could this killer be someone Sonia knew from her nursing career or from her working with pharmaceuticals?
'Gleave, 73, was discovered dead by her then 22-year-old friend and handyman Phil Kinsman on Dec. 30, 2010, in the garage of her Indian Trail home.'Another link = August 29 Sonia disappeared. December 29 was the day before PK found Audrey’s body.Do I have these dates correct from memory?
Meanwhile we have heard, that this officer SteveH was used to overdo it with his describing of the crime scene and murder.My ramblings right now……. AG has a « sexual component », LE will not give the cause of Sonia’s death. Could there be a link? Was a trophy taken from Audrey and this trophy-taking was similar to Sonia’s cause of death? Taking a female organ as a trophy would certainly leave a lot of blood. In AG’s case the officer said it was the worst of his career while with Sonia we know there was much blood.
Have LE looked into the Audrey + Sonia cases? And we don’t know how far Shelley’s case might have gone.
I'm starting to agree BUT Shelley and Sonia have to be the same person. Geographically it seems so.I believe, if at all, Sonia's and Shelley's case are connected (optical they were the same type of woman), but AG is another case and completely different. Alone AG's living situation was not comparable to Sonia and Shelley. The age wasn't. The optics weren't. The motive, we are thinking of, weren't. I think, there are 2 different murderers at least (if not 3 killers).
FromGermany, do you have a link for this info? It seems to be correct given all the different "facts" LE has presented. Thanks in advance if you can find the info.Meanwhile we have heard, that this officer SteveH was used to overdo it with his describing of the crime scene and murder.
FromGermany, do you have a link for this info? It seems to be correct given all the different "facts" LE has presented. Thanks in advance if you can find the info.
I didn't find anything and I've forgotten, who had written about it. But the searching got me stuck on interesting crimes, which have nothing to do with Audrey (google "Badegerow").I will try, but don't have much hope.
Audrey seemed to fear an attack on her and despite that she remained living at her secluded area in a big home, she didn't need and with a large garden, she didn't need, when she was getting older. All that, because she committed to never sell this home, as her ex-husband demanded at their divorce. Odd.It’s also interesting that women are called « paranoid » while a man would just « be cautious « .
I also am cautious about who has my email address. Perhaps Audrey had something on her email address that was only known to a small group of people. Something that could be controversial, I mean. Audrey did have a sense of humour so perhaps her email address reflected that.
Audrey seemed to fear an attack on her and despite that she remained living at her secluded area in a big home, she didn't need and with a large garden, she didn't need, when she was getting older. All that, because she committed to never sell this home, as her ex-husband demanded at their divorce. Odd.
I think, the bright white, roaring Camaro was by far the worst, she could have done to herself, if she feared to be attacked one day. There is nothing, that would have attracted much more attention than an elderly woman with this type of vehicle.AG doesn’t seem like the kind of person to follow an ex-husbands demands. I wonder why she went along with this. And, I wonder why this was demanded of her. Maybe having the Camaro made her feel powerful and somewhat protected?