In my heart I feel he is but if I was on the jury I’d need more hard evidence. I saw most of the trial except for yesterday. Was there any testimony that screamed he’s guilty?
So for me it’s the whole picture being painted. There is not one bit of massive evidence for me that says he is guilty, it’s the whole sum.
1) Dylan cuts off all communication with the world at 9.30pm when it’s been said he was a very active texter and went to bed late.
2) He was desperate to escape Mark and wanted to spend the first night with his mates. He made 6.30am plans and even told his friend he would harass him all morning if he didn’t let him in. So this doesn’t add up that he ditched his mates when he was the one who wanted to hang and never called them.
3) According to Mark years ago he said he came home and Dylan had left out a cereal bowl and tv was on so why didn’t Dylan text anybody. It doesn’t add up.
4) Mark was completely indifferent to Dylan being missing
5) Mark unlike millions of other victims when they have a missing child turned off his lights at 11pm instead of lightening up his house like a beacon of hope.
6) back dated a child support payment to the day Dylan went missing. How sick is that ?!!!
7) Mark claims Dylan went fishing yet mark had a creek across the street . Also Dylan took literally every single belonging he had to go and fish .
8) blood stains found on the seat Dylan would of been sitting on that night
9) Mark has zero items for the police dog
10) Mark speaking about Dylan in the past tense off the bat.
11) Not taking parts in searches then claims he was told not to. Which is funny is as oddly the Police never told Elaine that so we can assume Mark is lying here.
things off the top of my head to me that don’t make sense and point to guilt.
IMO MOO