Discussion in 'Recently Sentenced and Beyond' started by 0101ABA, Nov 8, 2019.
Hey Rocky! Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!
No No No not Toddler K!!
Gotta' admit it feels sort of over......in a good way.
Recently, I read something about an Amber Alert-like system for missing adults. I will Google it later.
Courteous sleuthers are da bomb!
I’m asking a question not just of you but of everyone - now that we’ve gone thru 2 weeks of trial, have you changed any theories you had before NOV 1? I’ll use you for one example - I believe you at one time thought that KB2 was not present in the condo at the time of the murder. Has trial testimony changed your opinion?
Anything that incriminates him, she'll just lie.
Never know, maybe his sister has turned on him.
If true, that's really weird timing.
His testimony would have much more naturally fit in on the heels of KK's testimony, as it would have corroborated her account of her actions after she came to town to clean up PF's mess.
The only reason I can think of to put this dude on the stand at this point would be d/t issues he might have had with traveling to/from Colorado earlier in the week.
I don't see his testimony as some hugely pivotal piece, and in fact it's somewhat disruptive to the case flow at this point, i.e., it's asking the jury to back-track and focus once again on KK's actions vs. PF's murderous ones.
I definitely hope he's not the last witness called, b/c it would be really anticlimactic.
Unless it was a literal smoking gun, it's definitely not a figurative smoking gun in this case, either.
Odd timing for this witness.
I agree and can't imagine why he'd even be called.
So SF2 sat on crucial evidence? I would have thought LE would have been all over the ranch hands beginning Dec 21, 2018.
I was also hoping there would be some test to determine if the sticky substance in the fire pit contained human composition. I don’t think the rest of the evidence we were hoping to hear more about was significant. Disappointing, but we all knew bleach and fire was troublesome.
There is zero probability that Baby K will be called.
We're talking not even a one in a septillion chance.
No worries on that score whatsoever.
At her age, neither her language nor her reasoning skills were anywhere NEAR where they would have needed to be developmentally in order for her to be able to either recall OR recount anything.
I think LE should just submit the husband/bf to websleuths and we'll tell them immediately who done it
I really hope SF is on the stand tomorrow!! I know she has said she'll plead the fifth, but CAN she, really? I mean, not for every question, right? If the question "what time did Patrick arrive on Thanksgiving?"- she has to answer that outright. It doesn't implicate herself in a crime to give an answer.
I am really hoping, though, for her 5th amendment plea/confirmation that she saw an enormous fire from her front porch and knew exactly what her precious boy was doing.
Could MD be what all the fuss is about? Seems kind of out there, but IDK......
February 19, 2019 - Tuesday
PF - Preliminary Hearing - 9am
Judge Scott Sells has ordered all witnesses be sequestered meaning they won’t be allowed in the courtroom until they take the stand.
The state asked for a written sequestration order.
One witness is a Woodland Park Police officer and the state has endorsed Michael Dalton as a witness too.
So, if the trial closes up tomorrow, do the jurors get sent immediately into deliberation? Or go home for the weekend and return Monday to deliberate?
OldLadyBlues whisperin, "Please let it be Mama. Please let it be Mama. Please let it be Mama... "
Agree 100%. I hope it was clear that I was saying no way to that thought - suggested by another poster.
Hmmm what if SF2 confided something about his brother to him - now that would be a bombshell IMO
Is that Dad with a phone?