Error505
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2020
- Messages
- 1,709
- Reaction score
- 30,250
Thank you so very much. Can’t tell you how much it’s appreciated. Off to read! Moo
Thank you so very much. Can’t tell you how much it’s appreciated. Off to read! Moo
PERFECT! So glad your memory is better than mine!I believe it was @Hoosierfan72
From Thread #32: CO - CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, did not return from bike ride, Chaffee County, 10 May 2020 #32
Ok, clarification on my end HoosierFan says DW said friend requests were that weekend. So, I misstated, he doesn’t say Saturday. We should find out M or T of this next week. MooI believe it was @Hoosierfan72
From Thread #32: CO - CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, did not return from bike ride, Chaffee County, 10 May 2020 #32
This is one of a few sources I was able to check out....another was a question and answer transcript where a doctor was describing how dart tranquilizers would affect humans...but I couldn't verify the sources....since it was a forum; not an article.Thank you so very much. Can’t tell you how much it’s appreciated. Off to read! Moo
I am also interested in the conversation between his two workers....when they decided to document Barry's activities. What triggered that exactly?I agree. BM must have said something believable to TN and GD because why would they get involved and tell a witness not to turn over her phone to LE. But again.. I'm glad they did because more fingers to point at BM
aaarrgghhh, I'll never catch up!
I don't want to skim because there are so many great posts, and I don't want to miss any!
So for now, just want to say Hi Everyone!, from here at the back of the caboose again. . . .
Have we started the countdown clock yet?
Did they tell MG she didn’t need to turn over her phone or to not turn over her phone. It is a subtle difference.I agree. BM must have said something believable to TN and GD because why would they get involved and tell a witness not to turn over her phone to LE. But again.. I'm glad they did because more fingers to point at BM
I am also interested in the conversation between his two workers....when they decided to document Barry's activities. What triggered that exactly?
Non-tekkie question.....if BM had a burner phone that he used to call MG with...wouldn't that number be identifiable and traceable for the purposes of recovering its history of use? There have been comments about Barry possibly using a burner phone...but if he used it to communicate with others....i would think it would be traceable if identifiable.I also found this in my old old notes. It is one of @OldCop 's posts.
BBM
"Also, according to MG, BM calls them on Monday morning “crying” about SM being missing. He tells them to stay there and wait for materials for the job to be delivered. He never asked them to come and help search for his wife. We don’t know when or if there was another conversation between BM and his workers. MG says they sat around until Tuesday and they still hadn’t received the proper tools or machinery. They decided to return to Salida. When they did, BM apparently found out because he sent TN and GD to talk to MG about hush money and (not) turning her phone over to LE. I don’t know if these two messengers also spoke with JP and the third worker.
If MG’s statements are true, BM did not want these witnesses back in town and he evidently thought there was something incriminating on MG’s phone. There was! The broken alibi! He was not at home with his sleeping wife at 5:00 a.m. He was on the road at 4:00 a.m. talking to MG. Even if he destroyed his own phone or a burner, MG’s will tell LE a lot that they needed to know. She turned her phone over either Tuesday or Wednesday and had at least one interview with LE. When BM found out, he fired her. Imagine his rage when he realized this woman might be his downfall? No wonder she left town.
He has since labeled her as a meth head."
4 am sure fits directly into the timeline that now been created!
Did they tell MG she didn’t need to turn over her phone or to not turn over her phone. It is a subtle difference.
Sorry.. correction. “We would give you your paycheck, but we don’t want it to look like hush-hush money. You have rights, but you don’t have to give CBI your phone.” "Did they tell MG she didn’t need to turn over her phone or to not turn over her phone. It is a subtle difference.
BM would have caught SM off guard, no doubt. If SM was still logged into whatever device she was using (phone or tablet), it would be very easy for BM to pick up said device and log in to find conversations/pics etc of SM’s last activities. Most passwords on iPhone, IPads are stored and can easily be located going into general settings. I have no doubt BM knew of the affair, but until then, probably not who! Iirc, one of the scenarios BM had of SMs disappearance was “someone she was close to harmed/took her”. MooIf the tranq dart wasn't immediately lethal, perhaps Barry wrested A NAME from Suzanne, and first chance he got, he went on her Facebook to find him, setting off the inadvertent friend requests, generated by a new device.
JMO
Why would these two men even have MG's paycheck to give to her? Wouldn't MG get her check from Barry? Why would they have it?Sorry.. correction. “We would give you your paycheck, but we don’t want it to look like hush-huWhy sh money. You have rights, but you don’t have to give CBI your phone.” "
‘I’m not the other woman’: Second contractor speaks out about Suzanne Morphew investigation | FOX21 News Colorado
I can't remember if it was Patrick Frazee or Krystal Kenney, but one of them had a burner. They also had Kelsey's phone. While the phones were together the phones had a way of communicating, and the phones were documenting it. I would imagine the same would be here in this circumstance.Non-tekkie question.....if BM had a burner phone that he used to call MG with...wouldn't that number be identifiable and traceable for the purposes of recovering its history of use? There have been comments about Barry possibly using a burner phone...but if he used it to communicate with others....i would think it would be traceable if identifiable.
Did I read somewhere that Barry thought she could have been having an emotional affair? I don’t think he had any idea at the time she was also having a physical affair. I like to think he found that out after the fact……BM would have caught SM off guard, no doubt. If SM was still logged into whatever device she was using (phone or tablet), it would be very easy for BM to pick up said device and log in to find conversations/pics etc of SM’s last activities. Most passwords on iPhone, IPads are stored and can easily be located going into general settings. I have no doubt BM knew of the affair, but until then, probably not who! Iirc, one of the scenarios BM had of SMs disappearance was “someone she was close to took her”. Moo
Pairing of devices maybe through BlueTooth. I’m not techie.I can't remember if it was Patrick Frazee or Krystal Kenney, but one of them had a burner. They also had Kelsey's phone. While the phones were together the phones had a way of communicating, and the phones were documenting it. I would imagine the same would be here in this circumstance.
BM has people does his dirty work. He’s a user of people. This scenario separates BM from the “personal” delivery of the message he wanted conveyed. They did his bidding. MooWhy would these two men even have MG's paycheck to give to her? Wouldn't MG get her check from Barry? Why would they have it?
According to AM, the conversation re: all wedding stopped at 2:30 pm May 9, FB friend requests happened Saturday May 9 in the pm.
Tiff, you might be able to jog my memory. We had a new WSer join about the time when info was coming out about SMs Saturday. He was a verified person (wife & he lived in Alexandria IN area, former friends SM or BM). His wife had reported the friending requests via Facebook happening on Saturday evening, May 9. Anyone else remember the account I’m speaking of. For the life of me, his name escapes me. He hasn’t posted in quite some time. Moo
I believe it was @Hoosierfan72
From Thread #32: CO - CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, did not return from bike ride, Chaffee County, 10 May 2020 #32