GUILTY CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #69

New Posts

LosAngeles said:
Yet, I’m thinking shouldn’t the attorneys advise against posting (exposing) this document in court? Quite unprofessional IMO.
Click to expand...

I dunno. Here, I can't honestly say I believe JLS failed to counsel MT on the Court's expectations of a defendant's conduct during trial. IMO, I just think MT (and her posse) don't believe rules apply to her.

JLS worked his tail for MT, and what a slap in his face for her to be charged with contempt while seated between her lawyers. It makes him look bad and we're now questioning his integrity! Personally, I'd want nothing to do with her. I'd be done. JMO
 
Seattle1 said:
I dunno. Here, I can't honestly say I believe JLS failed to counsel MT on the Court's expectations of a defendant's conduct during trial. IMO, I just think MT (and her posse) don't believe rules apply to her.

JLS worked his tail for MT, and what a slap in his face for her to be charged with contempt while seated between her lawyers. It makes him look bad and we're now questioning his integrity! Personally, I'd want nothing to do with her. I'd be done. JMO
Click to expand...
Maybe JLS should've thought better about coming out of the courthouse grinning like that with MT after those pretrial motions hearings. Even Norm Pattis manages to look serious going in and out of a courthouse.
 
LosAngeles said:
Yet, I’m thinking shouldn’t the attorneys advise against posting (exposing) this document in court? Quite unprofessional IMO.
Click to expand...
You would think so, but I am finding it quite hard to believe that Audrey Felson, at least, could claim no knowledge of what MT was up to, since she was next to MT, and was looking right at that screen. Could someone with such a detail oriented job, and so much at stake really be that unobservant? And don’t forget how hard Schoenhorn tried to get that document admitted into evidence.
 
Jmoose said:
You would think so, but I am finding it quite hard to believe that Audrey Felson, at least, could claim no knowledge of what MT was up to, since she was next to MT, and was looking right at that screen. Could someone with such a detail oriented job, and so much at stake really be that unobservant? And don’t forget how hard Schoenhorn tried to get that document admitted into evidence.
Click to expand...
Yes, and so very true. As one of our ardent earlier followers tended to suggest - and I unfortunately agree - seems we best lower our expectations as to anything being done with the former defense counsel JS and AF on the sealed restricted Report display. And add to that, lower expectations to subterranean levels IMO.

Most unfortunate if the case too. Why IMO both JS and AF are not being (or have not been investigated and questioned) and brought into court under oath to testify on the record is beneath me? Appalling lapse in ethical and legal investigation and accountability. And it will be most unfortunate if the CT court, judicial system do not hold any violating this to account. And one would hope that defense counsel JS and AF were also reported to the CT Office of Disciplinary Council for their conduct and formally requesting investigation of it. (Including also the multiple attempts IIRC that both defense counsel made to introduce the sealed restricted Report (or variants of it) on the record, in court! MOO
 
Jmoose said:
You would think so, but I am finding it quite hard to believe that Audrey Felson, at least, could claim no knowledge of what MT was up to, since she was next to MT, and was looking right at that screen. Could someone with such a detail oriented job, and so much at stake really be that unobservant? And don’t forget how hard Schoenhorn tried to get that document admitted into evidence.
Click to expand...
Audrey Felton is the Mean Girl’s side-kick. Really, this entire case plays like an old-skool teen drama.
Felson snuggling up, giggling and scheming with MT, the Ultimate Mean Girl.
Felson so desperate to be noticed & seen that she does MT’s bidding to further harm the victims.

Agree 100% that her behavior was unethical.
 
Baby baby Jane said:
Audrey Felton is the Mean Girl’s side-kick. Really, this entire case plays like an old-skool teen drama.
Felson snuggling up, giggling and scheming with MT, the Ultimate Mean Girl.
Felson so desperate to be noticed & seen that she does MT’s bidding to further harm the victims.

Agree 100% that her behavior was unethical.
Click to expand...
Not exactly a reply to your post, but I found this link on CT Capitol Report and felt I might share it here, as to some goings-on in a CT family court case. Judicial demeanor?
Connecticut Family Court Judge Escorted Out by Marshals, Reassigned to Civil Court
 
LosAngeles said:
I'm also a bit shocked that there is still a Fundly account for her appeal. They have raised 12K (hoping for 100K). I'm shocked that Fundly allows donations for a convicted murderer.
Click to expand...
Didn’t they take that down at one point? Did they roll the previous donations over from the Fundly for her legal defense while the trial was going on? It really is outrageous; I don’t think allows it (correct me if I am wrong). I am relieved that they have only received $12k, though. It says a lot about how little support there is in total for her.
 
pernickety said:
Not exactly a reply to your post, but I found this link on CT Capitol Report and felt I might share it here, as to some goings-on in a CT family court case. Judicial demeanor?
Connecticut Family Court Judge Escorted Out by Marshals, Reassigned to Civil Court
Click to expand...
Very interesting article. Thanks for posting. Sounds like this Judge either has no self control, lost his mind dealing with the CT Family Court system or never should have been appointed in the first place. I'm voting for all 3! Apparently this clown is a Gov. Ned Lamont appointee. Enough said imo.

BUT, I do very much applaud this out of control Judges efforts to jail a dead beat dad for not paying child support. Not done in CT enough imo.

IMO if Judge Heller had similar standards for payment of child support and financial disclosure for FD and had jailed him when he initially did not comply with financial disclosure requirements in Year 1 of the divorce action OR jailed him 2 years later when he again lied to Court about his finances its quite possible that JF might be alive today imo. The FD lying and lack of compliance imo wasn't dealt with harshly enough and I believe FD just got hit with a single contempt charge while in Family Court but there was no fine and no jail time unfortunately. Judge Heller imo never applied the 'stick' to FD and so he made a complete mockery of the Family Court, never paid child support and all the while he and his attorneys actually had the temerity to lie on the stand and in the documents submitted to the Court regarding financial disclosures.

MOO
 
Jmoose said:
Didn’t they take that down at one point? Did they roll the previous donations over from the Fundly for her legal defense while the trial was going on? It really is outrageous; I don’t think allows it (correct me if I am wrong). I am relieved that they have only received $12k, though. It says a lot about how little support there is in total for her.
Click to expand...
The Fundly account was removed two months ago. Is it back?
 
Somebody, somewhere saw that a young family member of Michelle’s made a social media post about her “innocence” on Sunday(read between the lines…)-I guess this and the fundraiser are the ways that the Troconises are gearing up for, and attempting to influence the sentencing. Is it possible that these lunatics might think she could get no additional prison time? Not possible!
 
Now we have 433612's bestie going down the street in Avon .5 miles from 4JX showing a lit fire in May LOL, and making a point to show the mailbox number, knowing people can just punch in the main road to see who lives there. These people are truly unhinged.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 183 more.
Total: 1,812 (members: 184, guests: 1,628)

Online statistics

Members online
184
Guests online
1,628
Total visitors
1,812
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
594,486
Messages
18,006,894
Members
229,416
Latest member
aimilino01
Back
Top